• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Reinforcing properties of lorazepam in normal volunteers.

作者信息

de Wit H, Johanson C E, Uhlenhuth E H

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 1984 Jan;13(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(84)90030-9.

DOI:10.1016/0376-8716(84)90030-9
PMID:6734422
Abstract

These experiments were designed to test the positive reinforcing property of a benzodiazepine in normal volunteer subjects. A choice procedure was used to measure preference for lorazepam, a benzodiazepine with a relatively short plasma half-life, over placebo. In separate experiments, subjects were given a choice between three doses of lorazepam (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg, p.o.) and placebo, and in a fourth experiment subjects were given a choice between lorazepam (1.0 mg) and a therapeutically equipotent dose of diazepam (5 mg). Subjective effects of the drugs were monitored using an experimental version of the Profile of Mood States and a shortened version of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. Subjects showed no preference for 0.5 mg lorazepam over placebo (49% drug choice) or for 1.0 mg lorazepam over diazepam (46% lorazepam choice). However, subjects preferred placebo to both 1.0 and 2.0 mg lorazepam (32% and 16% drug choice for 1.0 and 2.0 mg, respectively). Subjective effects were consistent with the drug's known sedative and anxiolytic properties. Relative to diazepam, lorazepam had a longer duration of effect than might be expected from its plasma half-life. Differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of the two drugs account for the results. The results showed that lorazepam is not an effective positive reinforcer in these subjects, suggesting that it also does not have high dependence potential in this population.

摘要

相似文献

1
Reinforcing properties of lorazepam in normal volunteers.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1984 Jan;13(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(84)90030-9.
2
The dependence potential of benzodiazepines.苯二氮䓬类药物的成瘾潜力。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1984;8 Suppl 4:48-59. doi: 10.1185/03007998409109544.
3
Lack of preference for flurazepam in normal volunteers.正常志愿者对氟西泮无偏好。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Dec;21(6):865-9. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(84)80066-0.
4
Lorazepam and diazepam effects on memory acquisition in priming tasks.劳拉西泮和地西泮对启动任务中记忆获取的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jul;115(3):397-406. doi: 10.1007/BF02245083.
5
A comparative clinical study for the evaluation of antianxiety agents, (lorazepam, diazepam and placebo), in neurosis.一项评估抗焦虑药物(劳拉西泮、地西泮和安慰剂)治疗神经症的比较临床研究。
Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1977;31(1):25-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1977.tb02680.x.
6
Drug preference in normal volunteers: effects of age and time of day.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;87(2):186-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00431805.
7
Effects of clorazepate, diazepam, lorazepam, and placebo on human memory.氯氮䓬、地西泮、劳拉西泮及安慰剂对人类记忆的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 Dec;44(12):436-9.
8
Interactions and comparative effects of zopiclone, diazepam and lorazepam on psychomotor performance and on elimination pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.佐匹克隆、地西泮和劳拉西泮对健康志愿者精神运动表现及消除药代动力学的相互作用和比较效应。
Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992 Feb;70(2):135-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1992.tb00443.x.
9
Relative abuse liability of lorazepam and diazepam: an evaluation in 'recreational' drug users.劳拉西泮和地西泮的相对滥用可能性:对“娱乐性”药物使用者的一项评估。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1988 Dec;22(3):215-22. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(88)90021-x.
10
Drug preference in humans: double-blind choice comparison of pentobarbital, diazepam and placebo.人类的药物偏好:戊巴比妥、地西泮与安慰剂的双盲选择比较
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1980 Dec;215(3):649-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of anorexia nervosa - too much for one drug?治疗神经性厌食症的药物治疗策略——一种药物是否太多?
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020 Jun;21(9):1045-1058. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1748600. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
2
Long-Term Use of Benzodiazepines: Implications and guidelines.苯二氮䓬类药物的长期使用:影响因素与指南
Can Fam Physician. 1992 Jan;38:149-53.
3
A therapeutic dose of zolpidem has limited abuse-like effects in drug-naïve females: a pilot study.一项初步研究:治疗剂量的唑吡坦对未使用过药物的女性具有有限的类滥用效应。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2008 Nov 19;598(1-3):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Sep 22.
4
Preference for diazepam, but not buspirone, in moderate drinkers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jan;123(2):154-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02246172.
5
A comparison of the acute behavioral effects of flunitrazepam and triazolam in healthy volunteers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 May;125(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/BF02247387.
6
Conditioned reinforcing effects of capsules associated with high versus low monetary payoff.与高货币回报和低货币回报相关的胶囊的条件强化效应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Jul;120(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02246143.
7
Drug preference in normal volunteers: effects of age and time of day.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;87(2):186-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00431805.
8
Drug deprivation and reinforcement by diazepam in a dependent population.地西泮对成瘾人群的药物剥夺与强化作用
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;91(2):154-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00217055.
9
Diazepam and triazolam self-administration in sedative abusers: concordance of subject ratings, performance and drug self-administration.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;99(3):309-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00445549.
10
Rebound insomnia and hypnotic self administration.反弹性失眠与催眠药物的自我服用
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;107(4):480-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02245259.