Kerber R E, Klein S, Kouba C, Aronson A
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Aug;4(2):253-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80210-7.
An automated device for defibrillation using a vertical shock pathway (tongue-epigastric or tongue-apex) has been developed. The energy requirements for defibrillation using vertical pathways are uncertain and will be determined largely by the impedance of the pathway. The purpose of this study was to determine the impedance characteristics of vertical defibrillation pathways in human subjects. Twenty patients undergoing elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, or both, were studied. Patients received shocks from electrodes placed in tongue-epigastric or tongue-cardiac apex positions. The tongue electrode was a 12 cm2 metal plate fixed to a standard plastic oropharyngeal airway. The epigastric or cardiac apex electrode was a 40 cm2 self-adhesive pad. The electrodes were connected to a standard damped-sinusoidal waveform defibrillator. It was found that the two vertical shock pathways had substantially higher impedance than the standard transthoracic pathway: tongue-epigastric pathway 130 +/- 11 omega (SD), tongue-apex pathway 115 +/- 12 omega, transthoracic pathway 68 +/- 11 omega (p less than 0.05). The higher impedance is probably due to the longer interelectrode distances of vertical pathways: tongue-epigastric 33 +/- 3 cm, tongue-apex 28 +/- 3 cm, transthoracic 23 +/- 3 cm (p less than 0.05). Vertical pathway shocks were successful in the cardioversion of 15 of 20 patients. Four of the five patients in whom vertical shocks were unsuccessful subsequently underwent successful cardioversion by transthoracic shocks; the transthoracic shocks achieved a higher current because of lower impedance of the transthoracic route.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
一种使用垂直电击路径(舌-上腹部或舌-心尖)的自动除颤装置已被研发出来。使用垂直路径进行除颤的能量需求尚不确定,且在很大程度上取决于该路径的阻抗。本研究的目的是确定人体受试者垂直除颤路径的阻抗特性。对20名接受择期房颤或房扑(或两者皆有)复律的患者进行了研究。患者接受置于舌-上腹部或舌-心尖位置电极的电击。舌电极是一块固定在标准塑料口咽气道上的12平方厘米金属板。上腹部或心尖电极是一块40平方厘米的自粘垫。电极连接到标准的阻尼正弦波形除颤器。结果发现,两条垂直电击路径的阻抗显著高于标准经胸路径:舌-上腹部路径为130±11Ω(标准差),舌-心尖路径为115±12Ω,经胸路径为68±11Ω(p<0.05)。较高的阻抗可能是由于垂直路径电极间距离更长:舌-上腹部为33±3厘米,舌-心尖为28±3厘米,经胸为23±3厘米(p<0.05)。20名患者中有15名通过垂直路径电击成功实现复律。5名垂直电击未成功的患者中有4名随后通过经胸电击成功复律;由于经胸路径阻抗较低,经胸电击产生了更高的电流。(摘要截断于250字)