Douglas D D, Risdall R J
Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jul;82(1):92-4. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/82.1.92.
Bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy specimens are of additive value when assessing various marrow disorders. Many physicians obtain both an aspirate and a trephine core when taking a biopsy of bone marrow, but opinions differ about which biopsy specimen should be obtained first. Some authors mention the possibility of artifactual hypocellularity and hemorrhage in the trephine biopsy specimen when trephine biopsy follows aspiration at the same site. This report describes the occurrence and significance of bone marrow aspiration artifact. The artifact usually occupies a relatively small area of the biopsy specimen and satisfactory evaluation of the marrow is still possible. However, the artifact occasionally hinders marrow evaluation, particularly when the trephine biopsy specimen is relatively short. Because the artifact is not observed in specimens obtained away from the aspiration site, it is best to perform the trephine biopsy before aspiration, or away from the aspiration site, especially when technical problems prevent obtaining a large amount of trephine material.
在评估各种骨髓疾病时,骨髓穿刺和骨髓活检标本具有补充价值。许多医生在进行骨髓活检时会同时获取穿刺物和活检组织芯,但对于应先获取哪种活检标本存在不同意见。一些作者提到,当在同一部位先进行穿刺后再进行活检时,活检标本中可能会出现人为的细胞减少和出血。本报告描述了骨髓穿刺假象的发生情况及意义。这种假象通常占据活检标本中相对较小的区域,对骨髓进行满意的评估仍是可能的。然而,这种假象偶尔会妨碍骨髓评估,特别是当活检组织芯相对较短时。由于在远离穿刺部位获取的标本中未观察到这种假象,所以最好在穿刺前或在远离穿刺部位进行活检,尤其是当技术问题导致无法获取大量活检材料时。