• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour.

作者信息

Craig A R, Franklin J A, Andrews G

出版信息

Br J Med Psychol. 1984 Jun;57(2):173-80. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1984.tb01597.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1984.tb01597.x
PMID:6743598
Abstract

Many behaviour, psychotherapy and healthy life-style programmes require subjects to take responsibility for the control of the old unwanted behaviours or to be responsible for maintaining new desired behaviours after therapy has ended. A scale to measure the locus of control of behaviour would be valuable if it could predict persons likely to relapse following apparently successful therapy. A 17-item Likert-type scale to measure this construct was developed and shown to have satisfactory internal reliability, to be test-retest reliable in the absence of treatment, to be independent of age, sex and social desirability, and to distinguish clinical disorder from normal non-clinical subjects. Furthermore, change towards internality (a reduced LCB score) during therapy was shown to predict maintenance or, alternatively, change towards externality (an increase or no change in the LCB score) was shown to predict relapse 10 months later in treated stutterers. The scale was shown to be related to the personal control factor of the Rotter I-E scale but to be more powerful a predictor of relapse than this personal control subscale or the full Rotter scale.

摘要

相似文献

1
A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour.
Br J Med Psychol. 1984 Jun;57(2):173-80. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1984.tb01597.x.
2
Validity and reliability of the revised scale of avoidance and struggle behaviours in stuttering (r-SASBS).口吃回避和抗争行为修订量表(r-SASBS)的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):e13135. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13135. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
3
Mental health locus of control in agoraphobia and depression: a longitudinal study of inpatients.广场恐惧症和抑郁症患者的心理健康控制源:一项住院患者的纵向研究。
Psychol Rep. 1991 Jun;68(3 Pt 1):1011-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3.1011.
4
Comparison of two locus of control scales in predicting relapse in an alcoholic population.两种控制点量表在预测酒精成瘾人群复发情况中的比较。
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Feb;72(1):43-50. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.1.43.
5
Documenting changes in adult speakers' locus of causality during stuttering treatment using Origin and Pawn scaling.使用原点和兵卒标度记录口吃治疗中成人说话者因果关系位置的变化。
J Fluency Disord. 2011 Sep;36(3):231-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
6
Prediction of outcome after treatment for stuttering.口吃治疗后结局的预测。
Br J Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;153:236-40. doi: 10.1192/bjp.153.2.236.
7
Stress, externality, and depression.压力、外部因素与抑郁症。
J Pers. 1984 Dec;52(4):326-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1984.tb00355.x.
8
The relation between the locus of control construct and involvement in traffic accidents.控制点结构与交通事故参与度之间的关系。
J Psychol. 1986 May;120(3):293-7. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1986.10545255.
9
Concurrent validation of the Levels of Attribution and Change (LAC) Scale.归因与改变程度(LAC)量表的同时效度验证
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Sep;46(5):618-22. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199009)46:5<618::aid-jclp2270460512>3.0.co;2-1.
10
Smoking-specific locus of control.吸烟特异性控制点
Psychol Rep. 1991 Dec;69(3 Pt 2):1075-81. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.3f.1075.

引用本文的文献

1
The Interplay of Personality Traits and Psychological Well-Being: Insights from a Study of Italian Undergraduates.人格特质与心理健康的相互作用:来自一项意大利本科生研究的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 21;22(2):132. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020132.
2
Australians' Well-Being and Resilience During COVID-19: The Role of Trust, Misinformation, Intolerance of Uncertainty, and Locus of Control.澳大利亚人在新冠疫情期间的幸福感与恢复力:信任、错误信息、对不确定性的不耐受以及控制点的作用。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 10;13(24):7495. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247495.
3
How Expectations and Trust in Telemedicine Contribute to Older Adults' Sense of Control: An Empirical Study.
远程医疗中的期望与信任如何影响老年人的控制感:一项实证研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;12(17):1685. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171685.
4
Problematic Gambling Behavior in a Sample of Gamblers: The Role of Alexithymia, Dissociation Features, and External Locus of Control.赌博人群中的问题性赌博行为:述情障碍、分离特征和外部控制源的作用。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Dec;40(4):2077-2091. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10322-6. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
5
Predictors of Psychological Well-Being and Quality of Life in Patients with Hypertension: A Longitudinal Study.高血压患者心理健康与生活质量的预测因素:一项纵向研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 9;12(6):621. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060621.
6
The relationship between clinical perfectionism and nonsuicidal self-injury: The roles of experiential avoidance, self-esteem, and locus of control.临床完美主义与非自杀性自伤的关系:体验回避、自尊和控制点的作用。
J Clin Psychol. 2023 Aug;79(8):1799-1815. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23506. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
7
A psychometric evaluation of the Italian short version of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III: Psychometric properties, measurement invariance across gender, convergent, and discriminant validity.《疼痛恐惧问卷-III意大利语简版的心理测量学评估:心理测量特性、性别间测量不变性、聚合效度和区分效度》
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1087055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1087055. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychological precursors of individual differences in COVID-19 lockdown adherence: Moderated-moderation by personality and moral cognition measures.新冠疫情封锁期间个体差异的心理先兆:人格与道德认知测量的调节调节作用
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Nov;182:111090. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111090. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
9
Through the Second Wave: Analysis of the Psychological and Perceptive Changes in the Italian Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic.穿越第二波:意大利人群在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理和认知变化分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(3):1635. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031635.
10
One-Year Change in Locus of Control among People with Dementia.痴呆症患者控制点的一年变化情况。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2021 Dec 7;11(3):298-305. doi: 10.1159/000520248. eCollection 2021 Sep-Dec.