Ellman H
Crit Care Med. 1984 Aug;12(8):629-33.
It is suspected, but still unproven, that the increased capillary permeability which accompanies sepsis and contributes to the development of pulmonary edema (PE) involves systemic as well as pulmonary capillaries. We investigated the relationship between the colloid osmotic pressure of serum (COPS) and edema fluid (COPE) in 16 septic and 19 nonseptic patients with severe generalized edema. COPS values of septic and nonseptic patients were not significantly different (14.6 +/- 2.1 and 15.8 +/- 3.4 torr, respectively). However, the COPE of septic patients was 2.4 +/- 0.7 torr while the COPE of nonseptic patients was 1.3 +/- 0.7 torr. The COPE/COPS ratio was 0.165 in septic patients and 0.084 in nonseptic patients. Both of these differences are significant (p less than .001). It was also possible to discriminate septic from nonseptic patients on the basis of the COPE/COPS ratio. Thus, 16/17 determinations in septic patients had a ratio greater than .1, while 17/22 determinations in nonseptic patients showed a ratio less than .1. PE was present in 8/16 septic patients but in only 2/19 nonseptic patients. These data suggest that the increase in capillary permeability during sepsis is generalized.
败血症时伴随出现的毛细血管通透性增加会促使肺水肿(PE)的发生,虽然这一点存在怀疑但仍未得到证实,而且这种毛细血管通透性增加涉及全身以及肺部的毛细血管。我们研究了16名患有严重全身性水肿的败血症患者和19名非败血症患者血清胶体渗透压(COPS)与水肿液胶体渗透压(COPE)之间的关系。败血症患者和非败血症患者的COPS值没有显著差异(分别为14.6±2.1和15.8±3.4托)。然而,败血症患者的COPE为2.4±0.7托,而非败血症患者的COPE为1.3±0.7托。败血症患者的COPE/COPS比值为0.165,非败血症患者为0.084。这两个差异均具有统计学意义(p小于0.001)。根据COPE/COPS比值也能够区分败血症患者和非败血症患者。因此,败血症患者16/17次测定的比值大于0.1,而非败血症患者22次测定中有17次比值小于0.1。16名败血症患者中有8名出现PE,而19名非败血症患者中只有2名出现PE。这些数据表明败血症期间毛细血管通透性的增加是全身性的。