Buck G E, Fojtasek C, Calvert K, Kelly M T
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):41-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.41-42.1982.
The CampyPak II (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) method for isolating Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni was evaluated with clinical specimens by comparison with an evacuation replacement procedure. Of 757 specimens, 26 (3.4%) were positive for C. fetus subsp. jejuni. All 26 were recovered by both systems. No difference was found in the time necessary for isolation, except with one isolate that required 3 days for isolation with CampyPak II and 2 days with the established procedure. Although the average colony size was slightly smaller for colonies incubated in the CampyPak II system (P less than 0.02 by a paired t test), this is probably of no practical consequence. In terms of technical performance, therefore, the CampyPak II system appears to be an excellent alternative method for establishing microaerophilic conditions necessary for isolating C. fetus subsp. jejuni. The only difference between the two systems was the cost of using the CampyPak II envelopes. Excluding the initial equipment costs, CampyPak II envelopes cost approximately $0.74 per specimen, whereas the standard Torbal jar technique cost about $0.10 per specimen.
通过与抽空置换法比较,使用CampyPak II(BBL微生物系统公司,马里兰州科基斯维尔)方法从临床标本中分离胎儿弯曲菌空肠亚种。在757份标本中,26份(3.4%)胎儿弯曲菌空肠亚种呈阳性。两种系统均分离出了所有26份阳性标本。除了1株分离菌使用CampyPak II分离需要3天而采用既定方法需要2天外,在分离所需时间上未发现差异。尽管在CampyPak II系统中培养的菌落平均大小略小(配对t检验,P小于0.02),但这可能没有实际影响。因此,就技术性能而言,CampyPak II系统似乎是建立分离胎儿弯曲菌空肠亚种所需微需氧条件的一种极佳替代方法。两种系统之间唯一的差异是使用CampyPak II封套的成本。不包括初始设备成本,CampyPak II封套每份标本成本约为0.74美元,而标准的Torbal罐技术每份标本成本约为0.10美元。