Lindhe J, Socransky S S, Nyman S, Haffajee A, Westfelt E
J Clin Periodontol. 1982 Jul;9(4):323-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1982.tb02099.x.
The present investigation was carried out on 15 individuals who were referred for treatment of moderately advanced periodontal disease. All patients were first subjected to a Baseline examination comprising assessment of oral hygiene and gingival conditions, probing depths and attachment levels. Following case presentation and instructions in oral hygiene measures, the patients were given periodontal treatment utilizing a split mouth design. In one side of the jaw scaling and root planing were performed in conjunction with a modified Widman flap procedure while in the contralateral jaw quadrants the treatment was restricted to scaling and root planing only. The period from initial treatment to 6 months after treatment was considered to be the healing phase and from 6-24 months after treatment the maintenance phase. During the healing phase the patients were recalled for professional tooth cleaning once every 2 weeks. During the maintenance phase the interval between the recall appointments was extended to 3 months. Reexaminations were carried out 6, 12 and 24 months after the completion of active treatment. The results revealed that treatment resulted in loss of clinical attachment in sites with initially shallow pockets, while sites with initially deep pockets gained clinical attachment. With the use of regression analysis "critical probing depths" were calculated for the two methods of treatment used. It was found that the critical probing depth value for scaling and root planing was significantly smaller than the corresponding value for scaling and root planing used in combination with modified Widman flap surgery (2.9 vs 4.2 mm). In addition, the surgical modality of therapy resulted in more attachment loss than the non-surgical approach when used in sites with initially shallow pockets. On the other hand, in sites with initial probing depths above the critical probing depth value more gain of clinical attachment occurred following Widman flap surgery than following scaling and root planing. The data obtained from the reexaminations 12 and 24 months after active treatment demonstrated that the probing depths and the attachment levels obtained following active therapy and healing were maintained more or less unchanged during a maintenance care period which involved careful prophylaxis once every 3 months. However, the data also disclosed that the level of oral hygiene maintained by the patients during healing and maintenance was more critical for the resulting probing depths and attachment levels than the mode of initial therapy used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本研究对15名因中度晚期牙周病前来治疗的个体进行。所有患者首先接受基线检查,包括口腔卫生和牙龈状况评估、探诊深度和附着水平评估。在病例介绍和口腔卫生措施指导后,患者采用分口设计接受牙周治疗。在一侧颌骨,刮治和根面平整联合改良Widman瓣手术进行,而在对侧颌骨象限,治疗仅限于刮治和根面平整。从初始治疗到治疗后6个月被视为愈合期,从治疗后6至24个月为维持期。在愈合期,患者每2周被召回进行专业牙齿清洁。在维持期,召回预约的间隔延长至3个月。在积极治疗完成后6、12和24个月进行复查。结果显示,治疗导致最初袋浅部位的临床附着丧失,而最初袋深部位获得了临床附着。通过回归分析计算了所使用的两种治疗方法的“临界探诊深度”。发现刮治和根面平整的临界探诊深度值明显小于与改良Widman瓣手术联合使用的刮治和根面平整的相应值(2.9对4.2毫米)。此外,当用于最初袋浅的部位时,手术治疗方式比非手术方法导致更多的附着丧失。另一方面,在初始探诊深度高于临界探诊深度值的部位,Widman瓣手术后比刮治和根面平整后获得更多的临床附着增加。积极治疗后12和24个月复查获得的数据表明,在每3个月进行一次仔细预防的维持护理期间,积极治疗和愈合后获得的探诊深度和附着水平或多或少保持不变。然而,数据还显示,患者在愈合和维持期间保持的口腔卫生水平对最终的探诊深度和附着水平比最初使用的治疗方式更为关键。(摘要截断于400字)