Woolfrey B F, Ramadei W A, Quall C O
Am J Clin Pathol. 1980 Mar;73(3):374-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/73.3.374.
This study investigates the dispensing and inoculating characteristics of the MIC-2000 micro-broth dilution system and compares its ability to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations with that of the reference macro-broth dilution method. Micro-well filling showed a coefficient of variation of 6.8%, and micro-well inoculating showed a coefficient of variation of 6.1%. The reference macro-broth dilution method showed a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for dispensing and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for inoculating. Ninety-three and eight tenths per cent of macro-broth minimum inhibitory concentrations duplicated the macro-broth modal value, with 100% falling within +/-1 double-dilution step. Eighty-five per cent of micro-broth minimum inhibitory concentrations duplicated the micro-broth modal value, with 99.8% falling within +/-1 double-dilution step. When the micro-broth results were evaluated using the macro-broth modal minimum inhibitory concentration value as a reference point, 55.8% duplicated the macro-broth modal value, with 4.7% falling above it and the remainder being skewed below it, with 6.2% at -2 double-dilution steps. These findings indicate that minimum inhibitory concentrations measured by the MIC-2000 system are somewhat lower than those of the reference macro-broth method. As a result, the micro-broth minimum inhibitory concentrations show a wider dispersion when referenced to the macro-broth modal minimum inhibitory concentration than when referenced to their own modal value.
本研究调查了MIC - 2000微量肉汤稀释系统的加样和接种特性,并将其测定最低抑菌浓度的能力与参考常量肉汤稀释法进行比较。微孔加样的变异系数为6.8%,微孔接种的变异系数为6.1%。参考常量肉汤稀释法加样的变异系数为2.9%,接种的变异系数为2.9%。93.8%的常量肉汤最低抑菌浓度与常量肉汤的众数相同,100%落在±1个双倍稀释步长范围内。85%的微量肉汤最低抑菌浓度与微量肉汤的众数相同,99.8%落在±1个双倍稀释步长范围内。当以常量肉汤众数最低抑菌浓度值为参考点评估微量肉汤结果时,55.8%与常量肉汤众数相同,4.7%高于该值,其余则偏向低于该值,6.2%处于 - 2个双倍稀释步长。这些发现表明,MIC - 2000系统测定的最低抑菌浓度略低于参考常量肉汤法。因此,与以自身众数为参考相比,当以常量肉汤众数最低抑菌浓度为参考时,微量肉汤最低抑菌浓度的离散度更大。