Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术期间分流术使用情况的回顾性比较。

A retrospective comparison of the use of shunts during carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Hertzer N R, Beven E G

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Jul;151(1):81-4.

PMID:6770477
Abstract

In this report, compared in retrospect is the incidence of intraoperative stroke among 152 operations performed under hypercarbic general anesthesia without carotid artery shunting, 260 operations performed under both hypercarbia and normocarbia anesthesia with selective shunting based upon internal carotid artery back pressure and 366 operations performed under normocarbia anesthesia with routine carotid artery shunting. Chi-square analysis determined that routine carotid shunting was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of intraoperative stroke among patients with previous transient ischemic attacks. In addition, both routine shunting and selective shunting, depending upon internal carotid artery back pressure, reduced the incidence of intraoperative stroke among patients with subtotal stenosis of the contralateral internal carotid artery. Considering the safety, simplicity and wide availability of Silastic carotid artery shunts, their routine use during carotid endarterectomy appears advisable in preference to more elaborate and expensive methods of intraoperative cerebral protection.

摘要

在本报告中,回顾性比较了152例在高碳酸血症全身麻醉且无颈动脉分流情况下进行的手术、260例在高碳酸血症和正常碳酸血症麻醉下根据颈内动脉背压进行选择性分流的手术以及366例在正常碳酸血症麻醉下进行常规颈动脉分流的手术中术中卒中的发生率。卡方分析确定,对于既往有短暂性脑缺血发作的患者,常规颈动脉分流与术中卒中发生率的显著降低相关。此外,常规分流和根据颈内动脉背压进行的选择性分流均降低了对侧颈内动脉次全狭窄患者术中卒中的发生率。考虑到硅橡胶颈动脉分流的安全性、简便性和广泛可用性,在颈动脉内膜切除术中常规使用该分流似乎比更复杂且昂贵的术中脑保护方法更为可取。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验