Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术期间分流术使用情况的回顾性比较。

A retrospective comparison of the use of shunts during carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Hertzer N R, Beven E G

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Jul;151(1):81-4.

PMID:6770477
Abstract

In this report, compared in retrospect is the incidence of intraoperative stroke among 152 operations performed under hypercarbic general anesthesia without carotid artery shunting, 260 operations performed under both hypercarbia and normocarbia anesthesia with selective shunting based upon internal carotid artery back pressure and 366 operations performed under normocarbia anesthesia with routine carotid artery shunting. Chi-square analysis determined that routine carotid shunting was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of intraoperative stroke among patients with previous transient ischemic attacks. In addition, both routine shunting and selective shunting, depending upon internal carotid artery back pressure, reduced the incidence of intraoperative stroke among patients with subtotal stenosis of the contralateral internal carotid artery. Considering the safety, simplicity and wide availability of Silastic carotid artery shunts, their routine use during carotid endarterectomy appears advisable in preference to more elaborate and expensive methods of intraoperative cerebral protection.

摘要

在本报告中,回顾性比较了152例在高碳酸血症全身麻醉且无颈动脉分流情况下进行的手术、260例在高碳酸血症和正常碳酸血症麻醉下根据颈内动脉背压进行选择性分流的手术以及366例在正常碳酸血症麻醉下进行常规颈动脉分流的手术中术中卒中的发生率。卡方分析确定,对于既往有短暂性脑缺血发作的患者,常规颈动脉分流与术中卒中发生率的显著降低相关。此外,常规分流和根据颈内动脉背压进行的选择性分流均降低了对侧颈内动脉次全狭窄患者术中卒中的发生率。考虑到硅橡胶颈动脉分流的安全性、简便性和广泛可用性,在颈动脉内膜切除术中常规使用该分流似乎比更复杂且昂贵的术中脑保护方法更为可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验