Dowding V M
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Feb 28;282(6265):683-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6265.683.
A survey of the 20 698 singleton births occurring in one year to women resident in the Greater Dublin area provided information on birth weight, birth order, and social class. Low (less than or equal to 2500 g), suboptimal (less than or equal to 3000 g), and optimal (3001-4499 g) birth weights all showed a linear relation with social class. The incidence of low and suboptimal birth weight was highest in first, fifth, and subsequent births, and conversely optimal weight was commonest in second, third, and fourth births. Analysis indicated that a major part of the birth-order effect was attributable to social class. Birthweight categories give information which may be distorted when using mean weight alone. The ue of suboptimal and optimal weight offers the possibility of more accurate assessment of trends in performance, particularly in small samples, than does the conventional sole use of low birth weight. Low and suboptimal birth weights are uncommon in Dublin.
对居住在都柏林大区的女性一年内所生的20698例单胎分娩进行的一项调查提供了有关出生体重、出生顺序和社会阶层的信息。低体重(小于或等于2500克)、次优体重(小于或等于3000克)和最优体重(3001 - 4499克)均与社会阶层呈线性关系。低体重和次优体重的发生率在第一胎、第五胎及后续胎次中最高,相反,最优体重在第二胎、第三胎和第四胎中最为常见。分析表明,出生顺序效应的主要部分可归因于社会阶层。出生体重类别提供的信息在仅使用平均体重时可能会被扭曲。与传统上仅使用低出生体重相比,使用次优体重和最优体重能够更准确地评估表现趋势,尤其是在小样本中。低体重和次优体重在都柏林并不常见。