• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The costs and effects of screening for cancer among asbestos-exposed workers.

作者信息

McNeil B J, Eddy D M

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(5):351-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90006-6.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9681(82)90006-6
PMID:6802863
Abstract

Several million workers previously exposed to asbestos are at risk each year for developing asbestosis or cancer as a result of this exposure. We have reviewed the data on the general effectiveness of screening for the two most common cancers found in these workers (lung cancer and colo-rectal cancer) and have compared the relative benefits expected from screening workers for colon or lung cancer 10, 15, 20 or 25 yr after their initial exposure. Although lung cancer is common, there is little evidence at present that screening for this disease is effective in reducing mortality. Colon cancer is less common, there is more evidence that screening is effective, and the relatively high risk of dying from this disease in asbestos workers makes screening useful. The cost per additional year of life extended by screening is only a few hundreds of dollars, making colon cancer screening programs for asbestos workers considerably more cost-effective than most other screening programs. We conclude that occupational safety agencies should consider implementing screening programs for colon cancer in workers exposed to asbestos over 10 yr ago.

摘要

相似文献

1
The costs and effects of screening for cancer among asbestos-exposed workers.
J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(5):351-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90006-6.
2
Lobe of origin in the attribution of lung cancer to asbestos.肺癌归因于石棉时的起源肺叶
Br J Ind Med. 1988 Aug;45(8):544-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.8.544.
3
The risk of lung cancer and mesothelioma after cessation of asbestos exposure: a prospective cohort study of shipyard workers.石棉暴露停止后肺癌和间皮瘤的风险:造船厂工人的一项前瞻性队列研究
Eur Respir J. 1992 Mar;5(3):281-5.
4
Lung cancer among asbestos cement workers. A Swedish cohort study and a review.石棉水泥工人中的肺癌。一项瑞典队列研究及综述。
Br J Ind Med. 1985 Jun;42(6):397-402. doi: 10.1136/oem.42.6.397.
5
[Screening for asbestos-related conditions].[石棉相关病症的筛查]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2009 Feb 2;171(6):433-6.
6
Lung cancer risk in past asbestos workers a few decades after exposure cessation and prospects for screening.停止接触石棉数十年后,既往石棉工人患肺癌的风险及筛查前景。
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2016 Jul 3;71(4):237-44. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2015.1134423. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
7
Occupational Asbestos Exposure and Incidence of Colon and Rectal Cancers in French Men: The Asbestos-Related Diseases Cohort (ARDCo-Nut).法国男性职业性石棉暴露与结肠癌和直肠癌发病率:石棉相关疾病队列研究(ARDCo-Nut)
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Mar;125(3):409-415. doi: 10.1289/EHP153. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
[Feasibility of a screening programme for lung cancer among workers previously heavily exposed to asbestos].[对既往大量接触石棉的工人开展肺癌筛查项目的可行性]
Med Lav. 2009;100 Suppl 1:29-32.
9
Feasibility of a screening programme for lung cancer in former asbestos workers.对曾接触石棉的工人进行肺癌筛查项目的可行性。
Occup Med (Lond). 2008 May;58(3):175-80. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqn018. Epub 2008 Mar 15.
10
Asbestos disease in sheet metal workers: the results of a proportional mortality analysis.
Am J Ind Med. 1985;7(4):315-21. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700070407.

引用本文的文献

1
Does asbestos exposure cause gastrointestinal cancer?接触石棉会导致胃肠道癌症吗?
Dig Dis Sci. 1985 Dec;30(12):1189-98. doi: 10.1007/BF01314055.
2
Screening blood donors for human immunodeficiency virus antibody: cost-benefit analysis.对献血者进行人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体筛查:成本效益分析。
Am J Public Health. 1988 Apr;78(4):450-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.4.450.
3
Biological monitoring and medical screening at the workplace in the EC countries.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63(5):347-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00381586.