Gerber A U, Wiprächtiger P, Stettler-Spichiger U, Lebek G
J Infect Dis. 1982 Apr;145(4):554-60. doi: 10.1093/infdis/145.4.554.
Comparative studies were performed in vitro to test the advocated superiority of infusion over intermittent injection of aminoglycosides. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was exposed to constant and to continuously decreasing (simulating in vivo kinetics) concentrations of gentamicin. In comparing the effect with similar area-under-the-concentration-vs.-time curves, a substantial difference in killing and regrowth could not be demonstrated. Regrowth occurred only when the gentamicin concentration had continuously decreased below one fourth of the minimal inhibitory concentration for greater than 2 hr. Exposure of P. aeruginosa to gentamicin for 30 min was followed by persistent suppression of bacterial regrowth for 1.4-1.9 hr. Thus, intermittent exposure of P. aeruginosa to gentamicin is as effective as constant exposure in vitro. The demonstrated persistent postantibiotic effect might cover in part the periods between intermittent doses of gentamicin in vivo as well as in vitro.
进行了体外比较研究,以检验所主张的氨基糖苷类药物输注优于间歇性注射的观点。将铜绿假单胞菌暴露于恒定以及持续降低(模拟体内动力学)浓度的庆大霉素中。在比较具有相似浓度-时间曲线下面积的效果时,未发现杀菌和再生长方面存在实质性差异。仅当庆大霉素浓度持续降至最低抑菌浓度的四分之一以下超过2小时时才会出现再生长。将铜绿假单胞菌暴露于庆大霉素30分钟后,细菌再生长受到持续抑制1.4 - 1.9小时。因此,铜绿假单胞菌间歇性暴露于庆大霉素在体外与持续暴露一样有效。所证实的抗生素后效应可能部分覆盖体内和体外庆大霉素间歇性给药之间的时间段。