Suppr超能文献

腹水pH值在酒精性肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎诊断中的应用

The pH of ascitic fluid in the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in alcoholic cirrhosis.

作者信息

Gitlin N, Stauffer J L, Silvestri R C

出版信息

Hepatology. 1982 Jul-Aug;2(4):408-11. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840020403.

Abstract

Fifty-six patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and ascites were studied. The ascitic fluid was analyzed for pH, PO2, PCO2 glucose, protein, specific gravity, amylase, lactic dehydrogenase, white blood cell count, polymorphonuclear count, and cytology. It was also cultured aerobically and anaerobically. Simultaneously, arterial blood was analyzed for pH, PO2, and PCO2. Venous blood was analyzed for complete blood count, protein, aspartate transaminase, and it was also cultured under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Six patients had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), i.e., culture was positive for Escherichia coli in five and Streptococcus faecalis in one. The mean (+/- S.E.) ascitic fluid pH in the SBP group wa 7.25 +/- 0.06 with a range of 7.12 to 7.31, while the ascitic fluid pH in the group with sterile ascites was 7.47 +/- 0.07 with a range of 7.39 to 7.58. The pH of the blood in both groups was 7.47 +/- 0.03. The pH of the ascites in the SBP group was significantly different from the pH in the group with sterile ascites, p less than 0.001. It was also significantly different from the blood pH, p less than 0.001. Highly significant inverse correlations existed between the ascitic pH in the SBP group and the ascitic white blood cell count (r = 0.84, p less than 0.01) and between the ascite pH in the SBP group and the ascitic polymorphonuclear count (r = -0.87 ,p less than 0.01). The ascitic fluid pH is recommended as an easy, quick, sensitive, and specific means of diagnosing SBP and it overcomes the problem of the present SBP diagnostic methods of utilizing an absolute white blood cell count greater than 500 per mm3 or a polymorphonuclear count greater than 250 per mm3 in which false positive interpretations occur.

摘要

对56例酒精性肝硬化腹水患者进行了研究。对腹水进行了pH值、氧分压(PO2)、二氧化碳分压(PCO2)、葡萄糖、蛋白质、比重、淀粉酶、乳酸脱氢酶、白细胞计数、多形核白细胞计数及细胞学检查。同时进行了需氧和厌氧培养。同时,对动脉血进行pH值、PO2和PCO2分析。对静脉血进行全血细胞计数、蛋白质、天冬氨酸转氨酶分析,并进行需氧和厌氧培养。6例患者发生自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP),即5例培养出大肠杆菌,1例培养出粪链球菌。SBP组腹水pH平均值(±标准误)为7.25±0.06,范围为7.12至7.31,而无菌腹水组腹水pH为7.47±0.07,范围为7.39至7.58。两组血液pH值均为7.47±0.03。SBP组腹水pH值与无菌腹水组腹水pH值有显著差异,p<0.001。与血液pH值也有显著差异,p<0.001。SBP组腹水pH值与腹水白细胞计数之间存在高度显著的负相关(r = 0.84,p<0.01),SBP组腹水pH值与腹水多形核白细胞计数之间也存在高度显著的负相关(r = -0.87,p<0.01)。推荐将腹水pH值作为诊断SBP的一种简便、快速、敏感且特异的方法,它克服了目前SBP诊断方法中采用绝对白细胞计数大于500/mm3或多形核白细胞计数大于250/mm3时出现假阳性结果的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验