Thou shalt not strive officiously.
作者信息
Bayliss R I
出版信息
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Nov 13;285(6352):1373-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6352.1373.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Thou shalt not strive officiously.你不可多管闲事。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Nov 13;285(6352):1373-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6352.1373.
2
"Thou shalt not kill": some legal and linguistic problems.“不可杀人”：一些法律和语言问题。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2004 Oct;71(5):355-7.
3
Withholding resuscitation.不进行复苏
Am Fam Physician. 1986 Jan;33(1):207-12.
4
THOU SHALT NOT KILL. SHOULD THOU STRIVE TO KEEP ALIVE?不可杀人。那么你应该努力求生吗？
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1965 May;4:305-8. doi: 10.1177/000992286500400514.
5
'....officiously to keep alive'.多管闲事地维持生命
Arch Dis Child. 1988 May;63(5):560-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.5.560.
6
Thou shalt not kill.不可杀人。
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Apr;61(4):301-2, 304-5.
7
Thou shalt not strike: a pronouncement from the AAMC.你不得攻击：美国医学院协会的一项声明。
New Physician. 1979 Feb;28(2):32.
8
Ten commandments of successful trial management.成功试验管理的十条戒律。
Prev Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;27(1):84-92. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0243.
9
Ethics of life support and resuscitation.生命支持与复苏的伦理学
N Engl J Med. 1988 Jun 30;318(26):1754-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198806303182611.
10
Euthanasia. The issue of resuscitation.安乐死。复苏问题。
Nurs Times. 1995;91(20):31-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Resuscitation decisions in the elderly: a discussion of current thinking.老年人的复苏决策：当前观点探讨
J Med Ethics. 1996 Oct;22(5):286-91. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.5.286.
2
Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with patients and relatives.与患者及其亲属讨论心肺复苏术。
Postgrad Med J. 1995 Oct;71(840):585-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.71.840.585.
3
Elderly patients and resuscitation. Advanced age is not a factor.老年患者与复苏。高龄并非一个影响因素。
BMJ. 1994 Aug 6;309(6951):407.
4
Does audit improve DNR decision making?审计能否改善“不要复苏”（DNR）决策？
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Jul-Aug;28(4):318-21.
5
Improving the documentation and appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions.改善心肺复苏决策的记录及合理性。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Mar;88(3):136-40.
6
The right to be allowed to die.被允许死亡的权利。
J Med Ethics. 1983 Sep;9(3):136-40. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.3.136.
7
Inappropriate use of intensive care.重症监护的不当使用。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;289(6460):1709-11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6460.1709.
8
Ethical dilemmas of brain failure in the elderly.老年人脑衰竭的伦理困境
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Dec 10;287(6407):1775-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6407.1775.
9
Acts and omissions, killing and letting die.作为与不作为，杀害与听任死亡。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jan 11;292(6513):126-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6513.126.
10
Life sustaining technology: making the decisions.维持生命的技术：做出决策。
BMJ. 1989 Apr 15;298(6679):978. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6679.978.
本文引用的文献
1
The do-not-resuscitate order in a teaching hospital: considerations and a suggested policy.教学医院中的“不要复苏”医嘱：考量因素及一项建议政策。
Ann Intern Med. 1982 May;96(5):660-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-5-660.
2
Relationship of therapy to prognosis in critically ill patients.危重症患者的治疗与预后的关系。
Crit Care Med. 1974 Mar-Apr;2(2):61-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-197403000-00002.
3
Confronting the decision to let death come.直面让死亡降临的决定。
Crit Care Med. 1974 May-Jun;2(3):113-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-197405000-00001.
4
To save or let die. The dilemma of modern medicine.救还是不救。现代医学的困境。
JAMA. 1974 Jul 8;229(2):172-6.
5
Orders not to resuscitate.
N Engl J Med. 1976 Aug 12;295(7):364-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197608122950705.
6
Law-medicine notes. "No code" orders: clarification in the aftermath of Saikewicz.法律与医学笔记。“不实施心肺复苏”医嘱：赛克维茨事件后的澄清
N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 19;299(16):875-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810192991608.
Zotero 插件