Bruce-Jones P N
Department of Medicine for the Elderly at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Dorset.
J Med Ethics. 1996 Oct;22(5):286-91. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.5.286.
Decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be based on medical prognosis, quality of life and patients' choices. Low survival rates indicate its overuse. Although the concept of medical futility has limitations, several strong predictors of non-survival have been identified and prognostic indices developed. Early results indicate that consideration of resuscitation in the elderly should be very selective, and support "opt-in" policies. In this minority of patients, quality of life is the principal issue. This is subjective and best assessed by the individual in question. Patients' attitudes cannot be predicted reliably and surrogate decision-making is inadequate. Lay knowledge is poor. However, patients can use prognostic information to make rational choices. The majority welcome discussion of resuscitation and prefer this to be initiated by their doctors; many wish to decide for themselves. There is little evidence that this causes distress. The views of such patients, if competent, should be sought actively.
关于心肺复苏的决策可能基于医学预后、生活质量和患者的选择。低生存率表明其存在过度使用的情况。尽管医学无效性的概念存在局限性,但已确定了一些强烈的非生存预测因素并开发了预后指数。早期结果表明,对老年人进行复苏的考虑应非常有选择性,并支持“选择加入”政策。在这少数患者中,生活质量是主要问题。这是主观的,最好由相关个体进行评估。患者的态度无法可靠预测,替代决策也不充分。外行的知识匮乏。然而,患者可以利用预后信息做出理性选择。大多数人欢迎关于复苏的讨论,并希望由他们的医生发起;许多人希望自己做出决定。几乎没有证据表明这会造成困扰。对于此类有行为能力的患者,应积极征求他们的意见。