Suppr超能文献

层流病房中无菌操作对急性白血病患者的技术及临床效果

Techniques and clinical effect of aseptic procedures on patients with acute leukemia in laminar airflow rooms.

作者信息

Takeo H, Sakurai T, Amaki I

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1983;13 Suppl 1:95-102.

PMID:6834660
Abstract

The techniques of aseptic procedures in the laminar airflow room (LAF) were evaluated in 110 adult patients undergoing antileukemic chemotherapy for remission induction. The patients were divided into three groups according to the regimens: Group A, consisting of 20 patients who stayed in the LAF and received the gown technique + sterile food + prophylactic oral and topical antibiotics; Group B, consisting of 12 patients who stayed in the LAF and received sterile food + prophylactic oral antibiotics; and Group C, consisting of 78 patients in open wards, who received prophylactic oral antibiotics alone. Species and numbers of microorganisms on the skin surface were far less in the patients in Group A than in those in Group B. Airborne microorganisms were counted by the air sampling method. No microorganisms could be detected at the time of the patient's rest and of blood collection in either Group A or B. Electrocardiography and X-ray examination caused an increase in the number of colonies to more than one colony in Group B, but Group A had a count of less than 0.5 colony. The colony counts became negative within 5 min after the cessation of each operation. The percentage of febrile days for patients with a peripheral granulocyte count of less than 100/microliter was 29% in Group A, 21% in Group B and 44% in Group C. The incidence of documented infections during the total hospital stay was 25% (5/20), 42% (5/12) and 86% (67/78), respectively. The aseptic procedures in Group B were not as strict as in Group A, but the incidence of infections in Group B was significantly lower than in Group C.

摘要

对110例接受抗白血病化疗以诱导缓解的成年患者,评估了层流洁净室(LAF)中的无菌操作技术。根据治疗方案将患者分为三组:A组,20例患者,留在层流洁净室,采用穿隔离衣技术+无菌食物+预防性口服和局部使用抗生素;B组,12例患者,留在层流洁净室,采用无菌食物+预防性口服抗生素;C组,78例患者,在普通病房,仅接受预防性口服抗生素。A组患者皮肤表面微生物的种类和数量远少于B组患者。通过空气采样法对空气中的微生物进行计数。A组和B组患者在休息和采血时均未检测到微生物。心电图和X线检查使B组菌落数增加至1个以上菌落,但A组菌落数少于0.5个菌落。每次操作停止后5分钟内菌落计数变为阴性。外周血粒细胞计数低于100/微升的患者,发热天数的百分比在A组为29%,B组为21%,C组为44%。住院期间有记录的感染发生率分别为25%(5/20)、42%(5/12)和86%(67/78)。B组的无菌操作不如A组严格,但B组的感染发生率显著低于C组。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验