Suppr超能文献

运动时的心脏反应:三种测力计的比较

Cardiac response to exercise: comparison of 3 ergometers.

作者信息

Moldover J R, Downey J A

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Apr;64(4):155-9.

PMID:6838341
Abstract

In order to establish guidelines for clinical decision making based on modified stress testing of physically handicapped individuals, 6 nonhandicapped volunteers exercised on 3 different ergometers, and their cardiac responses were compared. The ergometers were an upright bicycle, a supine bicycle, and an upright arm crank. The parameters measured were heart rate, rate pressure product, and oxygen consumption. Results showed that myocardial oxygen requirements are greater for upper extremity than for lower extremity exercise; the difference becomes increasingly more significant as exercise intensity increases. Myocardial oxygen requirements for supine exercise are greater than for upright exercise at low exercise intensity but lower at higher exercise intensities. Clinical implications of these findings must be interpreted cautiously as older disabled subjects may have different physiologic responses depending on the nature of their disabilities.

摘要

为了制定基于身体残疾个体改良应激测试的临床决策指南,6名非残疾志愿者在3种不同的测力计上进行锻炼,并比较他们的心脏反应。这些测力计分别是直立式自行车、仰卧式自行车和直立式手臂曲柄。测量的参数包括心率、率压积和耗氧量。结果表明,上肢运动的心肌需氧量高于下肢运动;随着运动强度的增加,这种差异变得越来越显著。在低运动强度下,仰卧运动的心肌需氧量大于直立运动,但在高运动强度下则较低。由于老年残疾受试者可能因其残疾性质而有不同的生理反应,这些发现的临床意义必须谨慎解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验