Suppr超能文献

皮肤刺激性评估:皮褶厚度测量

Assessment of skin irritancy: measurement of skin fold thickness.

作者信息

Wahlberg J E

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 1983 Jan;9(1):21-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04621.x.

Abstract

It is desirable to use more objective methods than visual scoring for the assessment of skin irritancy reactions. The edema, or fluid accumulation in the exposed skin sites, can be accurately measured by a caliper and this alternative method of assessment is evaluated from different aspects. Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and non-anoic acid in different concentrations were applied daily to human and animal (rabbit and guinea pig) skin, and a dose-response relationship established. Higher concentrations of the irritants induced an earlier response. With 5% SLS as the test substance and the increase in skin fold thickness as the single parameter of skin irritancy, the guinea pig was found to be less reactive than rabbit and man. Measurement techniques, reproducibility and advantages and disadvantages with different animal models are discussed.

摘要

对于皮肤刺激性反应的评估,使用比视觉评分更客观的方法是可取的。水肿,即暴露皮肤部位的液体蓄积,可以用卡尺精确测量,并且从不同方面对这种替代评估方法进行了评估。将不同浓度的十二烷基硫酸钠(SLS)和壬酸每日涂抹于人和动物(兔子和豚鼠)的皮肤,建立了剂量反应关系。刺激性物质浓度越高,反应出现越早。以5%的SLS作为测试物质,皮肤褶皱厚度增加作为皮肤刺激性的单一参数,发现豚鼠的反应性低于兔子和人类。讨论了测量技术、不同动物模型的可重复性以及优缺点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验