Cutler R G
Gerontology. 1983;29(2):113-20. doi: 10.1159/000213102.
Sullivan [1982] has stated without reservation that our paper [Tolmasoff et al., 1980] did not present data supporting the possibility that superoxide dismutase has a role in determining longevity in mammalian species. He states that the data instead support the hypothesis that there is no association between superoxide dismutase and lifespan. On reading his arguments, I find no errors in our data analysis or in the conclusion made. Instead, I find he has failed to recognize the critical components of our data and has consequently misinterpreted the results. Because similar oversight might be made by other readers of this paper, I have included a brief review of the rationale underlying our investigation of longevity determinants in mammalian species along with the reply to Sullivan's criticisms.
沙利文[1982]毫无保留地指出,我们的论文[托尔马索夫等人,1980]没有提供数据支持超氧化物歧化酶在决定哺乳动物寿命方面发挥作用的可能性。他指出,这些数据反而支持了超氧化物歧化酶与寿命之间没有关联的假设。在阅读他的论点时,我发现在我们的数据分析或得出的结论中没有错误。相反,我发现他没有认识到我们数据的关键组成部分,因此错误地解读了结果。由于本文的其他读者可能也会犯类似的疏忽,我在回复沙利文的批评时,简要回顾了我们对哺乳动物寿命决定因素进行研究的基本原理。