• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品中维生素C的分析值与食物成分表值:对老年受试者维生素C摄入量计算的影响。

Analytical versus food table values for vitamin C in foods: the effect on calculated vitamin C intake of elderly subjects.

作者信息

Black A E, Ashby D R, Day K C, Bates C J, Paul A A

出版信息

Hum Nutr Appl Nutr. 1983 Feb;37(1):9-22.

PMID:6841135
Abstract

During a longitudinal study of vitamin C nutrition in 23 healthy elderly people, samples of cooked vegetables and liver, canned meats, canned vegetables and fruit drinks were analysed for vitamin C content. The analytical data are presented here and the effect on calculated daily intake of vitamin C of using the analytical values in place of food table values is assessed. For cooked foods the analysed values were close to food table values; exceptions were spring cabbage, cauliflower and canned potatoes. Fortified fruit drinks contained 20-60 mg vitamin C per 100 ml and made an important contribution to intake. Canned meats contained 0.3-61.4 mg per 100 g (mean 14.9 mg), but their contribution to intake was considered small. The difference between daily intakes calculated using analytical and food table values was greater than 5 mg in 37 per cent of 1-day periods and in 17 per cent of 7-day periods. These differences were not sufficient to significantly alter the correlations between intake and biochemical indices found in the original study. Nevertheless, given the discrepancies between calculated and analysed vitamin C intakes reported in the literature, analytical work is probably essential in studies of vitamin C nutrition.

摘要

在一项针对23名健康老年人的维生素C营养纵向研究中,对熟蔬菜、肝脏、罐装肉类、罐装蔬菜和果汁饮料样本的维生素C含量进行了分析。此处呈现分析数据,并评估使用分析值代替食物表值对计算出的维生素C每日摄入量的影响。对于熟食,分析值与食物表值接近;例外情况是春甘蓝、花椰菜和罐装土豆。强化果汁饮料每100毫升含有20 - 60毫克维生素C,对摄入量有重要贡献。罐装肉类每100克含有0.3 - 61.4毫克(平均14.9毫克),但它们对摄入量的贡献被认为较小。在37%的单日时间段和17%的7日时间段内,使用分析值和食物表值计算出的每日摄入量差异大于5毫克。这些差异不足以显著改变原始研究中发现的摄入量与生化指标之间的相关性。然而,鉴于文献中报道的计算出的和分析出的维生素C摄入量之间存在差异,在维生素C营养研究中进行分析工作可能至关重要。

相似文献

1
Analytical versus food table values for vitamin C in foods: the effect on calculated vitamin C intake of elderly subjects.食品中维生素C的分析值与食物成分表值:对老年受试者维生素C摄入量计算的影响。
Hum Nutr Appl Nutr. 1983 Feb;37(1):9-22.
2
Extent of error in estimating nutrient intakes from food tables versus laboratory estimates of cooked foods.与熟食的实验室估算值相比,根据食物成分表估算营养素摄入量的误差程度。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007;16(2):227-39.
3
[Comparative assessment of vitamin C content and evaluation of energy intake in children daily food rations].[儿童日常食物定量中维生素C含量的比较评估及能量摄入评估]
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2003;54(3):287-93.
4
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
5
[Changes in vitamin C content of Bintje potatoes during storage and usual culinary preparations].[宾杰土豆在储存和常规烹饪过程中维生素C含量的变化]
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1983;53(4):402-11.
6
Comparison of plasma biomarkers with dietary assessment methods for fruit and vegetable intake.血浆生物标志物与水果和蔬菜摄入量膳食评估方法的比较。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Aug;57(8):988-98. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601634.
7
Analyzed vs. calculated intake of vitamin C among the Finnish rural population.芬兰农村人口维生素C摄入量的分析值与计算值对比
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1972;42(1):63-71.
8
Pantothenic acid content of 75 processed and cooked foods.75种加工和烹饪食品中的泛酸含量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1981 Feb;78(2):140-4.
9
[The overall nutritional quality of the diet is reflected in the growth of Nigerian children].尼日利亚儿童的生长情况反映了其饮食的总体营养质量。
Sante. 1999 Jan-Feb;9(1):23-31.
10
Evaluation of the daily amount of ascorbic acid supplied by food in France.法国食物中所提供的每日维生素C含量评估。
Ann Nutr Aliment. 1980;34(1):89-100.