Spiegel J S, Rubenstein L V, Scott B, Brook R H
N Engl J Med. 1983 May 19;308(20):1208-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198305193082007.
Several studies have concluded that specialists form a hidden system for primary-care delivery. However, these studies assume that a specialist who provides the majority of care is the primary-care physician. Using data for a one-year period from 2752 people enrolled in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment, we examined the validity of this conclusion. We compared the effects of three different definitions of a primary-care physician on identification of the primary-care provider: the physician who delivered the "majority of care" (34 per cent were specialists), the physician designated by the patient to receive the results of a multiphasic-screening examination (12 per cent were specialists), and the physician who treated common problems (9 per cent were specialists). Use of the "majority-of-care" criterion to define primary care overestimated by threefold the contribution specialists make to this activity. Definitions of a primary-care physician must be more specific and should include the tasks frequently associated with primary care, as well as patients' perceptions of the physician who provides their primary care.
多项研究得出结论,专科医生构成了基层医疗服务的一个隐性体系。然而,这些研究假定提供大部分医疗服务的专科医生就是基层医疗医生。利用兰德健康保险实验中2752名参与者一年的数据,我们检验了这一结论的有效性。我们比较了基层医疗医生的三种不同定义对确定基层医疗服务提供者的影响:提供“大部分医疗服务”的医生(34%是专科医生)、患者指定接收多项筛查检查结果的医生(12%是专科医生)以及治疗常见疾病的医生(9%是专科医生)。使用“大部分医疗服务”标准来定义基层医疗,将专科医生在这项活动中的贡献高估了三倍。基层医疗医生的定义必须更加具体,应包括与基层医疗经常相关的任务,以及患者对提供其基层医疗服务医生的认知。