Mungall D, Marshall J, Penn D, Robinson A, Scott J, Williams R, Hurst D
Ther Drug Monit. 1983;5(1):95-101.
We have studied 19 male patients whose theophylline therapy was individualized by a clinical pharmacokinetics service and 34 male patients with empirically derived dosages. All patients were admitted to the medical intensive care unit. Patients in the pharmacokinetics group had fewer adverse reactions (15.7 vs. 50%), shorter intensive care unit stay (6.6 +/- 5.5 vs. 12.4 +/- 16.3 days), shorter hospital stay (15.4 +/- 10 vs. 22.3 +/- 14.1 days), and a shorter period of time to be placed on oral therapy (5.2 +/- 3.1 vs. 8.6 +/- 7.2 days) than the group with empirically derived regimens. The pharmacokinetic method used to individualize theophylline therapy offered an accurate and efficient method of achieving therapeutic concentrations. We conclude that the use of clinical pharmacokinetics to individualize theophylline therapy offers substantial benefits over empirical assessments.
我们研究了19例接受临床药代动力学服务进行个体化茶碱治疗的男性患者以及34例接受经验性给药剂量的男性患者。所有患者均入住医疗重症监护病房。药代动力学组的患者不良反应较少(15.7% 对50%),重症监护病房住院时间较短(6.6±5.5天对12.4±16.3天),住院时间较短(15.4±10天对22.3±14.1天),与经验性给药方案组相比,开始口服治疗的时间也较短(5.2±3.1天对8.6±7.2天)。用于个体化茶碱治疗的药代动力学方法提供了一种准确且有效的达到治疗浓度的方法。我们得出结论,与经验性评估相比,使用临床药代动力学来个体化茶碱治疗具有显著优势。