Melton L J, Palumbo P J, Dwyer M S, Chu C P
Am J Epidemiol. 1983 May;117(5):559-65. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113578.
The effect of changing from the original to the new National Diabetes Data Group diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus was to delete 16.5% of the original diabetes incidence cohort described among Rochester, Minnesota, residents in 1945-1969, to shift the clinical spectrum at diagnosis toward more severe disease, to reduce relative survival, and to increase the risk of developing macro- or microvascular complications. The changes in apparent natural history were unexpectedly modest in magnitude, however, and should have little practical effect on comparisons of diabetes prognosis under the two different sets of diagnostic criteria.
从原来的糖尿病诊断标准变更为新的美国国家糖尿病数据组诊断标准后,1945年至1969年明尼苏达州罗切斯特居民中最初描述的糖尿病发病队列中有16.5%被剔除,诊断时的临床谱向更严重的疾病偏移,相对生存率降低,发生大血管或微血管并发症的风险增加。然而,明显的自然史变化在幅度上出人意料地小,并且对两种不同诊断标准下糖尿病预后的比较几乎没有实际影响。