Bar-Yishay E, Ben-Dov I, Godfrey S
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 May;127(5):572-4. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.5.572.
Nine young asthmatic subjects undertook isocapnic hyperventilation while breathing air under different conditions. Each subject undertook 2 pairs of tests. Pair A consisted of 2 hyperventilation challenges performed while breathing cold (2.8 +/- 1.4 degrees C) dry (2.3 +/- 0.05 mg H2O/L) air. Pair B consisted of an initial warm (38.0 +/- 0.9 degrees C) saturated air challenge followed by a cold dry challenge. Tests were closely matched in terms of ventilation and respiratory heat loss in the cold dry tests. The subjects were rendered refractory by the first cold dry hyperventilation challenge, the fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) after hyperventilation in the first test (delta FEV1 = 39 +/- 5%) being significantly greater than that after the second challenge of Pair A (delta FEV1 = 21 +/- 5%, p less than 0.005). In test Pair B, the warm humid hyperventilation challenge neither caused significant asthma (delta FEV1 6 +/- 3%) nor rendered the subjects refractory to the subsequent cold dry test (delta FEV1 38 +/- 4%). Because in a previous study it was shown that exercise while breathing warm humid air could induce a refractory period without itself causing asthma, we conclude that hyperventilation-induced asthma is not the same as exercise-induced asthma in most subjects.
九名年轻哮喘患者在不同条件下呼吸空气时进行了等碳酸过度通气。每名患者进行了2组测试。A组包括在呼吸冷(2.8±1.4℃)干(2.3±0.05mg H₂O/L)空气时进行的2次过度通气挑战。B组包括先进行一次暖(38.0±0.9℃)饱和空气挑战,随后进行冷干挑战。在冷干测试中,两组测试在通气和呼吸热损失方面紧密匹配。受试者在第一次冷干过度通气挑战后出现不应期,第一次测试过度通气后一秒用力呼气量(FEV₁)的下降(ΔFEV₁ = 39±5%)显著大于A组第二次挑战后的下降(ΔFEV₁ = 21±5%,p<0.005)。在B组测试中,暖湿过度通气挑战既未引发显著哮喘(ΔFEV₁ 6±3%),也未使受试者对随后的冷干测试产生不应期(ΔFEV₁ 38±4%)。因为在之前的一项研究中表明,呼吸暖湿空气时运动可诱发不应期而自身不引发哮喘,所以我们得出结论,在大多数受试者中,过度通气诱发的哮喘与运动诱发的哮喘不同。