Suppr超能文献

一种快速细胞培养技术,用于体外评估基于洗涤剂的产品的毒性,作为体内眼刺激性的一种可能筛选方法。

A rapid cell culture technique for assessing the toxicity of detergent-based products in vitro as a possible screen for eye irritancy in vivo.

作者信息

Kemp R B, Meredith R W, Gamble S, Frost M

出版信息

Cytobios. 1983;36(143-44):153-9.

PMID:6851660
Abstract

It is generally accepted that the Draize rabbit eye irritation test has several disadvantages and inadequacies when used as an indicator for potential irritancy of detergent-based commercial products. In the search for a possible in vitro screen, it was decided to use mouse LS cells in suspension, taking 50% cell death (CD50) after exposure to the product for 4 h as the endpoint. This result for eleven samples was compared with rabbit eye irritation data ranked on an arbitrary classification of mild, moderate and severe. All samples with a CD50 less than 0.5 mg ml-1 were severe eye irritants while, with one exception, all those with a CD50 greater than 1.0 mg ml-1 were mild irritants. Samples between these two cytotoxicity levels were, in general, moderately irritant to the rabbit eye. It would appear that the present in vitro test is a possible screen for the irritancy of detergent-based products.

摘要

一般认为,当用Draize兔眼刺激试验作为基于洗涤剂的商业产品潜在刺激性的指标时,该试验存在若干缺点和不足。在寻找可能的体外筛选方法时,决定使用悬浮的小鼠LS细胞,将产品暴露4小时后的50%细胞死亡(CD50)作为终点。将11个样品的该结果与根据轻度、中度和重度的任意分类排列的兔眼刺激数据进行比较。所有CD50小于0.5 mg/ml的样品都是严重的眼刺激物,而除一个例外,所有CD50大于1.0 mg/ml的样品都是轻度刺激物。处于这两种细胞毒性水平之间的样品通常对兔眼有中度刺激性。看来目前的体外试验可能是基于洗涤剂产品刺激性的一种筛选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验