Khouzami V A, Johnson J W, Daikoku N H, Rotmensch J, Hernandez E
J Reprod Med. 1983 Mar;28(3):189-94.
In a retrospective review of 697 postterm pregnancies we attempted to validate three tests used to identify the fetus at increased risk: the 24-hour urinary estrogen per gram creatinine (E/Cr), the nonstress test (NST) and the contraction stress test (CST). Using the corrected perinatal mortality rate (PMR) among term pregnancies (0.23%) as a standard for comparison, we found the PMRs among postterm patients with negative screening tests to be as follows: 0.23% with normal E/Crs, 0.65% with negative CSTs (not significantly different) and 2.4% with reactive NSTs (p less than 0.005). When we used intrapartum fetal distress as a standard for comparison, the E/Cr exhibited the highest sensitivity (88%) whereas those of the CST and NST were much lower (7-10%). The specificities were 63%, 98% and 92%, respectively. From this retrospective study the E/Cr appears to be of most assistance in identifying fetuses at increased risk, the CST is of intermediate assistance, and the NST is of least assistance.
在一项对697例过期妊娠的回顾性研究中,我们试图验证用于识别高危胎儿的三项检查:每克肌酐的24小时尿雌激素(E/Cr)、无应激试验(NST)和宫缩应激试验(CST)。以足月妊娠的校正围产期死亡率(PMR)(0.23%)作为比较标准,我们发现筛查试验结果为阴性的过期妊娠患者的PMR如下:E/Cr正常者为0.23%,CST阴性者为0.65%(无显著差异),NST有反应者为2.4%(p<0.005)。当我们以产时胎儿窘迫作为比较标准时,E/Cr的敏感性最高(88%),而CST和NST的敏感性则低得多(7 - 10%)。特异性分别为63%、98%和92%。从这项回顾性研究来看,E/Cr似乎在识别高危胎儿方面最有帮助,CST有中等帮助,而NST帮助最小。