Suppr超能文献

有应激与无应激产前胎儿心率检测的对比研究

Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.

作者信息

Keane M W, Horger E O, Vice L

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Mar;57(3):320-4.

PMID:7465146
Abstract

During an 18-month period 1328 nonstress tests (NST) and sequential contraction stress tests (CST) were performed on 566 patients. The criterion for reactivity was at least 2 accelerations associated with fetal movement during 20 minutes. The last test performed within 1 week of delivery was compared with perinatal outcome. A total of 1118 (84.2%) NSTs were reactive, and 210 (15.8%) were nonreactive. Of the CSTs 1249 (94.1%) were negative, 52 (3.9%) were positive, 16 (1.2%) were equivocal, and 11 (0.8%) were unsatisfactory. The correlation between a reactive NST and a negative CST was excellent (99.4%), whereas that between a nonreactive NST and a positive CST was poor (24.8%). Although the CST proved to be a better predictor of morbidity than the NST, both tests are highly significant predictors (P less than .001). Fetuses exhibiting both a nonreactive NST and a negative sequential CST are at no increased risk for morbidity. This study supports the concept that a precisely defined NST is an adequate screening tool for the evaluation of high-risk pregnancies.

摘要

在18个月的时间里,对566例患者进行了1328次无应激试验(NST)和连续宫缩应激试验(CST)。反应性的标准是在20分钟内至少有2次与胎动相关的加速。将分娩前1周内进行的最后一次检查与围产期结局进行比较。共有1118次(84.2%)NST反应性良好,210次(15.8%)无反应。在CST中,1249次(94.1%)为阴性,52次(3.9%)为阳性,16次(1.2%)为可疑,11次(0.8%)不满意。反应性NST与阴性CST之间的相关性极佳(99.4%),而无反应性NST与阳性CST之间的相关性较差(24.8%)。尽管CST被证明比NST更能预测发病率,但两种检查都是高度显著的预测指标(P<0.001)。NST无反应且连续CST为阴性的胎儿发病风险并未增加。本研究支持这样一种观念,即精确界定的NST是评估高危妊娠的一种充分的筛查工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验