• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硝苯地平与普萘洛尔联合治疗高血压的疗效

Effectiveness of combined nifedipine and propranolol treatment in hypertension.

作者信息

Yagil Y, Kobrin I, Stessman J, Ghanem J, Leibel B, Ben-Ishay D

出版信息

Hypertension. 1983 Jul-Aug;5(4 Pt 2):II113-7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.5.4_pt_2.ii113.

DOI:10.1161/01.hyp.5.4_pt_2.ii113
PMID:6862585
Abstract

The long-term antihypertensive effect of combined nifedipine and propranolol therapy was assessed in an open trial in 26 hypertensive patients (19 men, seven women, mean age 53 years). On propranolol alone (160 to 240 mg/day), the patients' average sitting blood pressure was 192 +/- 5/114 +/- 2 mm Hg. Propranolol was continued in a fixed dose and nifedipine was added in a dose that was gradually increased from 30 to 90 mg/day to achieve blood pressure (BP) values below 160/95 mm Hg. Twenty-two patients remained on the combined regimen for 14 to 30 weeks. Their BP decreased to 136 +/- 3/84 +/- 2 mm Hg on an average daily dose of 59.5 mg nifedipine. Seventeen of the 22 subjects were subsequently treated sequentially with propranolol alone, combined therapy, and nifedipine alone, to assess the relative efficacy of each mode of therapy. The combined regimen was found to be more effective than either drug alone. Side effects occurred in 13 of 26 patients. Four dropped out 4 to 11 weeks after starting nifedipine because of either intolerable flushing (2), allergic rash (1), or headache (1). Nine subjects experienced mild reactions that were well tolerated. It is concluded that the combined use of propranolol and nifedipine is effective in the long-term treatment of moderately severe hypertension and offers an alternative therapeutic approach that deserves further evaluation.

摘要

在一项开放性试验中,对26例高血压患者(19例男性,7例女性,平均年龄53岁)评估了硝苯地平与普萘洛尔联合治疗的长期降压效果。仅使用普萘洛尔(每日160至240毫克)时,患者的平均坐位血压为192±5/114±2毫米汞柱。普萘洛尔维持固定剂量,并添加硝苯地平,剂量从每日30毫克逐渐增加至90毫克,以使血压(BP)值低于160/95毫米汞柱。22例患者持续联合治疗方案14至30周。他们在平均每日服用59.5毫克硝苯地平的情况下,血压降至136±3/84±2毫米汞柱。随后,22名受试者中的17名依次接受了单独使用普萘洛尔、联合治疗和单独使用硝苯地平的治疗,以评估每种治疗方式的相对疗效。结果发现联合治疗方案比单独使用任何一种药物都更有效。26例患者中有13例出现副作用。4例在开始使用硝苯地平4至11周后因无法耐受的面部潮红(2例)、过敏性皮疹(1例)或头痛(1例)而退出。9名受试者出现了耐受性良好的轻度反应。结论是,普萘洛尔和硝苯地平联合使用对中度重度高血压的长期治疗有效,并提供了一种值得进一步评估的替代治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of combined nifedipine and propranolol treatment in hypertension.硝苯地平与普萘洛尔联合治疗高血压的疗效
Hypertension. 1983 Jul-Aug;5(4 Pt 2):II113-7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.5.4_pt_2.ii113.
2
The combination of propranolol and nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension: acute and long term effects.普萘洛尔与硝苯地平联合治疗高血压:急性和长期效果
Postgrad Med J. 1983;59 Suppl 2:114-8.
3
Effect of nifedipine and propranolol on blood flow, venous compliance and blood pressure in essential hypertension.硝苯地平和普萘洛尔对原发性高血压患者血流、静脉顺应性及血压的影响。
Can Med Assoc J. 1985 May 15;132(10):1137-41.
4
Multicenter comparison of the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and long-acting propranolol in patients with mild to moderate systemic hypertension receiving diuretics. A preliminary experience.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统与长效普萘洛尔在接受利尿剂治疗的轻至中度系统性高血压患者中的多中心比较。初步经验。
Am J Med. 1987 Dec 21;83(6B):15-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90631-0.
5
Atenolol-nifedipine combinations compared to atenolol alone in hypertension: efficacy and tolerability.阿替洛尔-硝苯地平联合用药与单用阿替洛尔治疗高血压的疗效及耐受性比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Apr;25(4):425-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb03325.x.
6
Efficacy and safety of nitrendipine in patients with severe hypertension: a multiclinic study.尼群地平治疗重度高血压患者的疗效与安全性:一项多中心研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1053-9.
7
Comparison of nifedipine and propranolol used in combination with diuretics for the treatment of hypertension.硝苯地平与普萘洛尔联合利尿剂治疗高血压的比较。
Am J Med. 1987 Mar 30;82(3B):37-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90209-9.
8
Hypotensive action of nifedipine (Ca2+-antagonist) and propranolol in acute trials and its long-term therapy of hypertensive coronary heart disease patients.硝苯地平(钙拮抗剂)和普萘洛尔在急性试验中的降压作用及其对高血压冠心病患者的长期治疗
Jpn Heart J. 1981 Jul;22(4):575-84. doi: 10.1536/ihj.22.575.
9
Isradipine vs propranolol in hydrochlorothiazide-treated hypertensives. A multicenter evaluation.伊拉地平与普萘洛尔治疗氢氯噻嗪控制的高血压患者的多中心评估
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2453-7.
10
Management of severe hypertension with nifedipine in combination with clonidine or propranolol.硝苯地平联合可乐定或普萘洛尔治疗重度高血压
Arzneimittelforschung. 1980;30(4):674-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of BAY l 5240, a fixed combination of low dose nifedipine and acebutolol on hypertension: comparison with standard dose nifedipine.低剂量硝苯地平与醋丁洛尔固定组合制剂BAY l 5240对高血压的影响:与标准剂量硝苯地平的比较
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985;28(1):17-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00635702.
2
Calcium channel antagonists. Part III: Use and comparative efficacy in hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. Minor indications.钙通道拮抗剂。第三部分:在高血压和室上性心律失常中的应用及疗效比较。次要适应症。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988 Mar;1(6):625-56. doi: 10.1007/BF02125750.
3
Calcium channel antagonism and beta blockade in combination--a therapeutic alternative in cardiovascular disorders. A review.
钙通道拮抗与β受体阻滞剂联合应用——心血管疾病的一种治疗选择。综述
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Jun;3(3):355-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01858108.
4
Nifedipine and hypertension: roles of vasodilation and sodium balance.硝苯地平与高血压:血管舒张及钠平衡的作用
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:295-301. doi: 10.1007/BF00148474.
5
Nifedipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders.硝苯地平。对其在缺血性心脏病、高血压及相关心血管疾病中的药效学、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1985 Sep;30(3):182-274. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198530030-00002.
6
Behavioral performance effects of nifedipine in normotensive and renovascular hypertensive baboons.硝苯地平对正常血压和肾血管性高血压狒狒行为表现的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;100(1):124-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02245802.