• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威利福德中枢听觉处理测试组的电磁特性评估

Assessment of electromagnetic characteristics of the Willeford Central Auditory Processing Test Battery.

作者信息

Shea S L, Raffin M J

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Mar;26(1):18-21. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2601.18.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2601.18
PMID:6865375
Abstract

Electromagnetic characteristics of eight tape recordings of the Willeford Central Auditory Processing Test Battery were assessed. Measurements indicate that when recording levels are referenced to the calibration tone preceding a given subtest of that battery, significant intertape differences, interest differences, and interchannel differences in the recording levels of test items exist. Mean recording levels of items used in the Rapidly Alternating Speech Perception, Low-Pass Filtered Speech, and Competing Sentences subtests typically were within 10 dB of the reference tone. Recording levels for the Binaural Fusion subtest yielded intertape differences of as much as 26.5 dB. Given the large intertape inconsistencies in recording levels, extreme caution should be exercised in the use of these recordings.

摘要

对Willeford中央听觉处理测试组的八份录音的电磁特性进行了评估。测量结果表明,当将录音电平参考该测试组给定子测试之前的校准音时,测试项目的录音电平存在显著的磁带间差异、感兴趣差异和声道间差异。快速交替言语感知、低通滤波言语和竞争句子子测试中使用的项目的平均录音电平通常在参考音的10分贝范围内。双耳融合子测试的录音电平产生的磁带间差异高达26.5分贝。鉴于录音电平存在较大的磁带间不一致性,在使用这些录音时应格外谨慎。

相似文献

1
Assessment of electromagnetic characteristics of the Willeford Central Auditory Processing Test Battery.威利福德中枢听觉处理测试组的电磁特性评估
J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Mar;26(1):18-21. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2601.18.
2
Auditory perceptual problems in children: considerations for the otolaryngologist and audiologist.
Laryngoscope. 1980 Jun;90(6 Pt 1):962-71. doi: 10.1002/lary.1980.90.6.962.
3
Age effects and normative data on a Dutch test battery for auditory processing disorders.荷兰听觉处理障碍测试组的年龄效应及常模数据。
Int J Audiol. 2002 Sep;41(6):334-46. doi: 10.3109/14992020209090408.
4
Central auditory testing and dyslexia.
Laryngoscope. 1980 Jun;90(6 Pt 1):972-84. doi: 10.1002/lary.1980.90.6.972.
5
Age effects on performance on the Willeford Central Auditory Processing Test Battery.
J Aud Res. 1983 Apr;23(2):131-5.
6
An opinion on the assessment of people who may have an auditory processing disorder.关于对可能患有听觉处理障碍者的评估意见。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):97-105. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.2.4.
7
Intelligibility of degraded speech and the relationship between symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity and language impairment in children with suspected auditory processing disorder.疑似听觉处理障碍儿童的言语清晰度下降情况以及注意力不集中、多动/冲动症状与语言障碍之间的关系。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;101:178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
8
Development of an auditory test battery for young children: a pilot study.
Int J Audiol. 2004 Jun;43(6):330-8. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050042.
9
Development of a central auditory test battery for adults.成人中枢听觉测试组合的开发。
Audiology. 2001 Mar-Apr;40(2):69-77.
10
Normative data for diagnosing auditory processing disorder in Norwegian children aged 7-12 years.挪威7至12岁儿童听觉处理障碍诊断的规范数据。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan;57(1):10-20. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1366670. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Cortical mechanisms of across-ear speech integration investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).使用功能近红外光谱 (fNIRS) 研究跨耳语音整合的皮质机制。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0307158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307158. eCollection 2024.