Pimm P E, Shephard R J, Silverman F
Arch Environ Health. 1978 Jul-Aug;33(4):201-13. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1978.10667335.
Effects of passive inhalation of cigarette smoke at levels typically encountered in public buildings have been investigated. Twenty normal male and female nonsmokers (18 to 30 years) were each exposed for two hours on alternate days (in random order) to either room air or room air plus machine-produced cigarette smoke. Exposures were conducted in an unventilated chamber (14.6 m3). Subdivisions of lung volume, maximum expiratory flow-volume curves, single-breath nitrogen washout curves, blood carboxyhemoglobin levels, and heart rates were obtained before, during, and after exposure. A submaximal bicycle ergometer test and a symptom questionnaire were also administered after exposure. Statistical analysis revealed several significant differences between test and control days; the magnitude of the changes was small and of questionable biological significance, however, particularly when account was taken of the number of statistical comparisons made. Despite the relatively small physiological changes, subjective complaints were common-cough, and eye irritation, for example. It is concluded that in normal subjects the magnitude of physiological responses to acute exposures is minimal; thus arguments concerning effects rest on symptomatology and such other factors as the unknown risks of chronic exposure.
针对在公共建筑中通常会遇到的水平的香烟烟雾被动吸入影响进行了研究。二十名正常的成年男女非吸烟者(年龄在18至30岁之间),每隔一天(以随机顺序)在不通风的房间(14.6立方米)中暴露于室内空气或室内空气加机器产生的香烟烟雾中两小时。在暴露前、暴露期间和暴露后,获取了肺容积细分、最大呼气流量-容积曲线、单次呼吸氮洗脱曲线、血液中碳氧血红蛋白水平以及心率。暴露后还进行了次极量自行车测力计测试和症状问卷调查。统计分析显示测试日与对照日之间存在若干显著差异;然而,变化幅度较小且生物学意义存疑,尤其是考虑到所进行的统计比较数量时。尽管生理变化相对较小,但主观不适很常见,例如咳嗽和眼睛刺激。得出的结论是,在正常受试者中,急性暴露引起的生理反应幅度极小;因此,关于影响的争论基于症状学以及诸如慢性暴露的未知风险等其他因素。