Suppr超能文献

使用疼痛评定量表的研究。

Studies with pain rating scales.

作者信息

Downie W W, Leatham P A, Rhind V M, Wright V, Branco J A, Anderson J A

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Aug;37(4):378-81. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.4.378.

Abstract

Good correlation has been shown between pain scores derived from 4 different rating scales. The correlation was maintained when presentation of the scales was separated by a series of questions and by physical examination. There is good evidence that the 4 scales are measuring the same underlying pain variable as they calibrate well. There is also evidence that an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale performs better than both a 4-point simple descriptive scale or a continuous (visual analogue) scale.

摘要

研究表明,源自4种不同评分量表的疼痛评分之间具有良好的相关性。当通过一系列问题和体格检查将量表的呈现分开时,这种相关性依然存在。有充分证据表明,这4种量表测量的是同一个潜在疼痛变量,因为它们校准良好。也有证据表明,11分制(0 - 10)数字评分量表的表现优于4分简单描述性量表或连续(视觉模拟)量表。

相似文献

1
Studies with pain rating scales.使用疼痛评定量表的研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Aug;37(4):378-81. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.4.378.
4
Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.疼痛:三种常用疼痛评定量表综述
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
10
[Elbow pain].[肘部疼痛]
Duodecim. 2010;126(16):1945-51.

引用本文的文献

9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验