Harrison E, Magee D, Quinney H
School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Clin J Sport Med. 1996 Jul;6(3):163-70. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199607000-00005.
To develop an evaluation tool for patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) patients.
Exploratory, descriptive content validation study.
Convenience sample, three groups of clinicians: 15 sports physical therapists, 9 sports medicine physicians, and 10 physical therapists and physicians with limited experience with PFPS. Selection based on specialization qualifications and experience with PFPS patients. DESCRIPTION OF TESTS: Content validation questionnaire to determine importance of clinical outcomes in determining change in PFPS patients. Using 10-cm visual analogue scales, reviewers rated the importance of five domains and rated the importance of twenty-one clinical tests; using a categorical scale, determined appropriateness and clarity of potential patient questionnaire items.
Correlation values indicated significant correlation (p < 0.01) between pain and functional limitations (r = 0.068) and activity and functional limitations (r = 0.67), indicating that functional limitation may not be a unique component, but is integrated with pain and activity. A set of five pain questions, twelve function questions and six activity questions was developed. No statistical differences (p < 0.05) between the three groups of clinicians for the majority of clinical tests. Statistical differences (p < 0.05) between the three groups for rating of importance of flexibility of hip flexor and flexibility of gastrocnemius-soleus muscle groups, knee swelling, and radiographs. Good internal consistency among the 21 clinical tests (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84). The five top rated tests considering mean score values and standard deviations: lower extremity alignment, patellar orientation, patellar mobility, and flexibility of rectus femoris and tensor fasciae latae muscle groups.
The results provide evidence of content validity for the components of PFPS evaluation investigated. The findings provide a basis of design of an evaluation tool for PFPS patients consisting of patient self-report questionnaire items and clinical tests.
为髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)患者开发一种评估工具。
探索性、描述性内容效度研究。
便利样本,三组临床医生:15名运动物理治疗师、9名运动医学医生以及10名对PFPS经验有限的物理治疗师和医生。根据专业资质和对PFPS患者的经验进行选择。
内容效度问卷,用于确定临床结果在判定PFPS患者病情变化中的重要性。评审人员使用10厘米视觉模拟量表对五个领域的重要性进行评分,并对21项临床测试的重要性进行评分;使用分类量表确定潜在患者问卷项目的适当性和清晰度。
相关性值表明,疼痛与功能受限(r = 0.068)以及活动与功能受限(r = 0.67)之间存在显著相关性(p < 0.01),这表明功能受限可能不是一个独特的组成部分,而是与疼痛和活动相互关联。制定了一组五个疼痛问题、十二个功能问题和六个活动问题。三组临床医生对大多数临床测试的结果无统计学差异(p < 0.05)。三组在髋屈肌柔韧性、腓肠肌-比目鱼肌群柔韧性、膝关节肿胀和X光片重要性评分方面存在统计学差异(p < 0.05)。21项临床测试具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.84)。根据平均分和标准差,五项评分最高的测试为:下肢对线、髌骨方向、髌骨活动度以及股直肌和阔筋膜张肌柔韧性。
研究结果为所调查的PFPS评估组件提供了内容效度的证据。这些发现为设计一种针对PFPS患者的评估工具提供了基础,该工具包括患者自我报告问卷项目和临床测试。