• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与工作场所健康筛查的应答者与未应答者的比较。

Comparison of respondents and nonrespondents to a worksite health screen.

作者信息

Settergren S K, Wilbur C S, Hartwell T D, Rassweiler J H

出版信息

J Occup Med. 1983 Jun;25(6):475-80. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198306000-00014.

DOI:10.1097/00043764-198306000-00014
PMID:6886850
Abstract

As part of an evaluation of the voluntary health promotion program offered by Johnson & Johnson to its employees, comparisons were made between nonrespondents and respondents (75% of all employees) in the baseline health screen. A survey of randomly selected nonrespondents was conducted in 1979-1980 to collect health and life-style information. Comparisons between respondents and nonrespondents on a multitude of characteristics indicated that the nonrespondents reported life-styles as healthful as those of the respondents with the exception that significantly more nonrespondents reported ever having smoked cigarettes and significantly more female nonrespondents currently smoke. These results suggest that the systematic biases found among nonrespondents in general population health surveys do not exist among this more homogeneous employed population and imply that the participants in the program provide a good estimate of the health status and life-style of the entire workforce.

摘要

作为对强生公司为其员工提供的自愿健康促进计划评估的一部分,在基线健康筛查中对未回复者和回复者(占所有员工的75%)进行了比较。1979年至1980年对随机挑选的未回复者进行了一项调查,以收集健康和生活方式信息。对回复者和未回复者在众多特征上的比较表明,未回复者报告的生活方式与回复者一样健康,只是有显著更多的未回复者报告曾经吸烟,且有显著更多的女性未回复者目前仍在吸烟。这些结果表明,在一般人群健康调查中未回复者中发现的系统性偏差在这个更同质化的就业人群中不存在,这意味着该计划的参与者能很好地估计整个劳动力的健康状况和生活方式。

相似文献

1
Comparison of respondents and nonrespondents to a worksite health screen.参与工作场所健康筛查的应答者与未应答者的比较。
J Occup Med. 1983 Jun;25(6):475-80. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198306000-00014.
2
Effect of the Johnson & Johnson Live for Life program on employee smoking.
Prev Med. 1988 Jan;17(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(88)90069-2.
3
Worksite health promotion programs in the U.S.: factors associated with availability and participation.美国的工作场所健康促进项目:与可及性和参与度相关的因素
Am J Health Promot. 1998 Sep-Oct;13(1):36-45. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.1.36.
4
The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators.无应答对参考人群患病率估计值的影响:基于人群队列研究的见解。社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究调查人员。
Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;6(6):498-506. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00104-4.
5
Maximizing worksite survey response rates through community organization strategies and multiple contacts.通过社区组织策略和多次联系来最大化工作场所调查的回应率。
Am J Health Promot. 1991 Nov-Dec;6(2):130-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-6.2.130.
6
Corporate characteristics and worksite health promotion programs: survey findings from Fortune 500 companies.企业特征与工作场所健康促进计划:来自《财富》世界500强公司的调查结果
Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(5):491-501. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90382-6.
7
An epidemiologic study of the benefits and risks of running.一项关于跑步益处与风险的流行病学研究。
JAMA. 1982 Dec 17;248(23):3118-21.
8
Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire.对一份邮政健康调查问卷的早期和晚期回复者的比较。
Epidemiology. 1993 Jul;4(4):375-9. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199307000-00014.
9
Worksite health promotion: its evolution and the Johnson & Johnson experience.工作场所健康促进:其发展历程及强生公司的经验
Prev Med. 1990 Jan;19(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90002-2.
10
Selected barriers and incentives for worksite health promotion services and policies.工作场所健康促进服务与政策的特定障碍及激励因素。
Am J Health Promot. 2007 May-Jun;21(5):439-47. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.5.439.

引用本文的文献

1
Adult day health care evaluation study: methodology and implementation. Adult Day Health Care Evaluation Development Group.成人日托健康护理评估研究:方法与实施。成人日托健康护理评估发展小组。
Health Serv Res. 1991 Feb;25(6):935-60.
2
A comparison of results of a national cholesterol and blood pressure screening with the NHANES II Study: implications for further emphasis on reducing cardiovascular risk among Americans.
J Community Health. 1992 Aug;17(4):247-57. doi: 10.1007/BF01321656.