Abstract
The emphasis on cost containment and consumer satisfaction has spurred a new upsurge in interest in all-RN nursing. Data are mounting that show that an all-RN staff doesn't necessarily cost more and that its use markedly improves the quality of patient care. Although obstacles to implementation exist, they are not insurmountable, and nurse leaders are asking, "Why not?"
摘要
相似文献
1
The all-RN staff: why not?
Hospitals. 1978 Oct 16;52(20):107-8, 110, 112.
2
Team or primary nursing care?团队护理还是责任制护理？
Nurs Outlook. 1984 Nov-Dec;32(6):322-7.
3
All-RN model of nursing care delivery: a cost-benefit evaluation.全注册护士护理服务模式：成本效益评估
Inquiry. 1983 Summer;20(2):173-84.
4
Primary nursing. Teamwork is the answer.责任制护理。答案是团队合作。
J Nurs Adm. 1985 Sep;15(9):21-6.
5
Primary nursing: does good care cost more?责任制护理：优质护理是否成本更高？
Can Nurse. 1982 Apr;78(4):42-9.
6
[Various administrative changes have solved a lot of problems in nursing].
Sygeplejersken. 1988 Aug 10;88(32):8-10.
7
Professional nurse staffing and primary care: a cost comparison.专业护士配备与初级护理：成本比较
Mich Hosp. 1985 Feb;21(2):19-22.
8
Primary nursing. Structural changes.责任制护理。结构变革。
Nurs Times. 1987;83(39):36-7.
9
Primary practice partners: analysis of cost and staff satisfaction.主要执业合作伙伴：成本与员工满意度分析
Nurs Econ. 1991 May-Jun;9(3):201-4.
10
Nurse mentor system cuts costs, boosts quality of patient care.护士导师制度降低成本，提高患者护理质量。
Hospitals. 1979 Jan 1;53(1):93-4, 101.
Zotero 插件