Suppr超能文献

团队护理还是责任制护理?

Team or primary nursing care?

作者信息

Chavigny K, Lewis A

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 1984 Nov-Dec;32(6):322-7.

PMID:6567848
Abstract

This study was undertaken to help nursing administration make policy decisions regarding the initiation of primary care nursing and the need to hire RNS. The work involved an experimental design using 11 units in a 350-bed facility. The results show no significant differences between the two methods regarding quality, cost, job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, or patient education. Moreover, the 16-hour model produces more stress and more sick leave days than team nursing. It is also apparent that apart from salaries, the cost of nursing care is a function of the diagnoses of the patients in the hospital, which may account for some of the inconsistencies found in the literature. If the ratio of RN to non-RN staff had been increased, the results might have been different; however, Giovanetti's comparison study of primary and team nursing, which considered the same factors but used a 70-percent-RN staff, produced similar results. It appears that individual RN's dedication and preparation for patient care may be more important than the method used to organize that care. Research to determine how to select the most appropriate nurse for a specific role would be a more productive approach to assist policy determination in the future.

摘要

本研究旨在帮助护理管理部门就开展初级护理以及雇佣注册护士(RNS)的必要性做出政策决策。该工作涉及在一个拥有350张床位的机构中使用11个单元进行实验设计。结果显示,在质量、成本、工作满意度、患者满意度或患者教育方面,两种方法之间没有显著差异。此外,16小时模式比团队护理产生更多压力和更多病假天数。同样明显的是,除了薪资外,护理成本是医院中患者诊断情况的函数,这可能解释了文献中发现的一些不一致之处。如果注册护士与非注册护士的人员比例增加,结果可能会有所不同;然而,乔瓦内蒂对初级护理和团队护理的比较研究考虑了相同因素,但使用了70%为注册护士的人员配置,却得出了类似结果。看来,注册护士个人对患者护理的奉献精神和准备工作可能比组织护理的方法更为重要。未来,确定如何为特定角色选择最合适护士的研究将是协助政策制定的更有效途径。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验