Geden E A, Cohen P D
Res Nurs Health. 1980 Dec;3(4):163-72. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770030408.
The questions addressed in this study were whether testing first- and second-voided urine specimens yielded different results and whether selected commercial testing product (Clinitest 2 drop, Clinitest 5 drop, Tes-Tape, and Keto-Diastix) yielded similar estimates of glucosuria. Twenty adult diabetic experiencing glucosuria served as subjects. First- and second-voided specimens were collected before meals and before retiring. Data were analyzed using a three-way ANOVA with repeated measures on all factors. The findings indicated significant main effects for product type, F (3,57) = 7.61, p = .0004, and time of day, F (3,57) = 8.60, p = .0002. The main effect for first- and second-voided specimens did not approach significance.
本研究探讨的问题是，检测首次排尿和第二次排尿的尿液标本是否会产生不同结果，以及选定的商用检测产品（Clinitest两滴法、Clinitest五滴法、尿糖试纸和酮体试纸）对糖尿的估计是否相似。20名出现糖尿的成年糖尿病患者作为研究对象。在饭前和睡前收集首次排尿和第二次排尿的标本。使用三因素重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。结果表明，产品类型的主效应显著，F(3,57)=7.61，p = .0004；一天中的时间的主效应也显著，F(3,57)=8.60，p = .0002。首次排尿和第二次排尿标本的主效应未达到显著水平。
