Burke G
Prim Care. 1980 Dec;7(4):615-24.
There is a tendency for physicians to approach ethical problems in a manner similar to that in which they approach medical problems. Instead of disease categories (such as congestive heart failure or diarrhea), the physician substitutes moral quandaries (such as euthanasia or abortion). The goal is to learn what the "right" rules are for this particular problem at this particular moment. Although this method has important practical and instructive value, it can produce an empirical attitude toward ethics akin to that found in students who strive to learn medicine solely by algorithms. Using theoretical models as a center for discussion, this article has attempted to approach medical ethics as a decision-making process derived from the physician-patient relationship model in use. What is the type of physician-patient relationship that forms the soundest base for making ethical decisions? It must be realized that the contractual relationship cannot be ignored, for in our consumer-oriented society it will surely remain as a protection for the patient against the incompetent or immoral physician. It should not become the sole guide of physician behavior, however, lest we be satisfied with mediocre behavior as the maximal standard. Likewise, although technical competence is required for one to make the right and good decision, it is insufficient alone as a guide for moral behavior. Given the medically correct facts, a multitude of responses are available which necessitate a moral choice. Physicians need a guiding principle that goes beyond any aesthetic code of behavior, or protection of self-interest, and which enables them to deal with all the unexpected ethical questions faced in providing care to patients. Moral principles such as truth-telling, promise-keeping, and protecting the patient when he is vulnerable, help the physician to act in a moral manner, but lack the encompassing nature of the covenantal promise. The covenantal model includes a donative element that empowers the physician to go beyond any specific prescriptions of behavior in repayment of his gifted position. It inspires fidelity to the patient and the profession and respect for the patient's rights as an individual without either falling prey to the presumptuous attitude of the parental model or the legalistic tone of the contractual model.
医生倾向于以类似于处理医疗问题的方式来处理伦理问题。医生将道德困境(如安乐死或堕胎)取代了疾病类别(如充血性心力衰竭或腹泻)。目标是了解在这个特定时刻针对这个特定问题的“正确”规则是什么。尽管这种方法具有重要的实践和指导价值,但它可能会产生一种对伦理的实证态度,类似于那些仅通过算法努力学习医学的学生所具有的态度。本文以理论模型为讨论中心,试图将医学伦理视为从正在使用的医患关系模型中推导出来的决策过程。哪种医患关系类型构成了做出伦理决策最坚实的基础?必须认识到契约关系不能被忽视,因为在我们以消费者为导向的社会中,它肯定会作为患者抵御不称职或不道德医生的一种保护措施而存在。然而,它不应成为医生行为的唯一指南,以免我们满足于将平庸行为作为最高标准。同样,尽管做出正确和良好的决策需要技术能力,但仅靠它作为道德行为的指南是不够的。基于医学上正确的事实,有多种应对方式可供选择,这就需要进行道德选择。诸如讲真话、信守承诺以及在患者脆弱时保护患者等道德原则,有助于医生以道德方式行事,但缺乏契约性承诺所具有的全面性。契约性模型包含一个捐赠元素,使医生有能力超越任何特定的行为规定,以回报他所获得的地位。它激发对患者和职业的忠诚,以及对患者作为个体权利的尊重,既不会陷入家长式模型的专横态度,也不会陷入契约式模型的法律主义基调。