• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床标准。

Clinical criteria.

作者信息

Ryge G

出版信息

Int Dent J. 1980 Dec;30(4):347-58.

PMID:6935165
Abstract

Criteria for the evaluation of the physical and chemical properties of dental materials have been available for many years. However, the final decision about the acceptability of a dental restorative material for use in the mouth can only come from clinical observation. This paper attempts to set out a systematic approach to the clinical assessment of restorative materials by posing a series of questions, to each of which an answer Yes or No can be given. The system makes provision for reaching decisions on marginal adaptation, restoration and preservation of anatomic form, protection against recurrence caries, and in the case of materials used in anterior restorations, colour match and cavo surface margin discoloration. Using these criteria, restorations can be classified into four categories: those within a range of excellence, those which although showing minor deviations from the ideal are nevertheless acceptable, those which should be replaced for preventive reasons to avoid the likelihood of future damage and those which require immediate replacement.

摘要

评估牙科材料物理和化学性质的标准已经存在多年。然而,关于一种牙科修复材料能否用于口腔的最终决定只能来自临床观察。本文试图通过提出一系列问题,给出是或否的答案,从而阐述一种系统的修复材料临床评估方法。该系统为在边缘适应性、解剖形态的恢复和保存、预防继发龋以及在前牙修复中使用的材料的颜色匹配和洞缘变色等方面做出决策提供了依据。使用这些标准,修复体可分为四类:卓越范围内的修复体、虽与理想情况有轻微偏差但仍可接受的修复体、因预防原因应更换以避免未来损坏可能性的修复体以及需要立即更换的修复体。

相似文献

1
Clinical criteria.临床标准。
Int Dent J. 1980 Dec;30(4):347-58.
2
The clinical significance of marginal fit.
Northwest Dent. 2012 Jan-Feb;91(1):22-9.
3
A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.含表面预反应玻璃离子填料的聚硅氧烷修复系统的临床评估:13年随访检查结果
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Oct;145(10):1036-43. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.57.
4
Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.直接树脂复合材料修复体与间接复合嵌体:一年的结果。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 May 1;11(3):025-32.
5
[Evaluation of the quality of proximal restorations with plastic materials: radiographic study].[使用塑料材料的近端修复体质量评估:影像学研究]
Odontostomatol Trop. 2015 Sep;38(151):5-12.
6
Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities.Dyract用于I类小龋洞的五年临床评估。
Am J Dent. 2006 Feb;19(1):41-6.
7
Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.可填充复合树脂修复体的六年临床评估
Oper Dent. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):11-7. doi: 10.2341/08-48.
8
Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.不同后牙树脂复合材料的临床评估:一份7年报告。
Quintessence Int. 2003 Jun;34(6):418-26.
9
One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems.后牙复合树脂修复体的一年临床评估:粘接系统的影响。
Oper Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;37(6):E1-8. doi: 10.2341/10-375-C. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.乳牙复合树脂和复合体修复体的临床评估:24个月结果
J Dent. 2006 Jul;34(6):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical evaluation of direct and indirect restorations in class I cavities: a 10-year follow-up study.I类洞直接和间接修复体的临床评估:一项10年随访研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 25;25(1):1430. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06775-9.
2
Clinical outcomes of direct resin-composite restorations in primary maxillary incisors in patients with early childhood caries: a prospective non-controlled cohort study.乳牙龋患儿上颌乳切牙直接树脂复合材料修复的临床疗效:一项前瞻性非对照队列研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 20;25(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05814-9.
3
The clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer-based and bulk-fill resin-based restorations in permanent teeth with occlusal or proximal cavities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于高粘度玻璃离子和大块充填树脂的修复体在恒牙咬合面或邻面龋洞中的临床性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 7;29(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06127-x.
4
Influence of Cavity Lining on the 3-Year Clinical Outcome of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.窝洞衬层对后牙复合树脂修复体3年临床疗效的影响:一项随机对照临床试验
Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 7;12(5):128. doi: 10.3390/dj12050128.
5
Digital technology for fluid resin injection to close anterior diastema after orthodontic treatment.数字化技术在正畸治疗后用于封闭前牙间隙的流体树脂注射。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 1;41(1):114-122. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.01.016.
6
The impact of Bis-GMA free and Bis-GMA containing resin composite as posterior restoration on marginal integrity: a randomized controlled clinical trial.无 Bis-GMA 和含 Bis-GMA 的树脂复合材料作为后牙修复对边缘完整性的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):1022. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03759-5.
7
Randomized Clinical Split-Mouth Study on Partial Ceramic Crowns Luted with a Self-adhesive Resin Cement with or without Selective Enamel Etching: Long-Term Results after 15 Years.随机临床分口研究:部分陶瓷冠采用自粘结树脂水门汀粘结,是否选择性釉质酸蚀:15 年后的长期结果。
J Adhes Dent. 2023 Oct 6;25:177-186. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b4478817.
8
The clinical success of ART restorations and Hall technique in primary molars: a randomized 18-month follow-up study.乳牙中ART修复术和霍尔技术的临床成功率:一项为期18个月的随机随访研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2023 May 1;48(2):e19. doi: 10.5395/rde.2023.48.e19. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Five-Year Clinical Performance of Complex Class II Resin Composite and Amalgam Restorations-A Retrospective Study.复杂II类树脂复合材料和银汞合金修复体的五年临床性能——一项回顾性研究
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;11(4):88. doi: 10.3390/dj11040088.
10
Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study.采用修订后的 FDI 标准评估直接修复体:可靠性研究结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1519-1528. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04771-9. Epub 2022 Nov 18.