Kusy R P
Am J Orthod. 1981 Jun;79(6):625-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90355-9.
The theoretical strength, stiffness, and range of nickel-titanium and beta titanium arch wires are compared with several stainless steel or cobalt-chrome wires. With the apparent stiffness as the criterion, equivalent force systems are established in the elastic region between the conventional and the new arch wire alloys. In bending, such calculations show that the nickel-titanium alloy makes superior starting wire, 0.016, 0.018, and 0.018 by 0.018 inch wires having stiffnesses similar to multistranded 0.0175, round 0.012, and 0.014 inch stainless steel wires, respectively, but with about twice the strength and range. By the same method of analysis, the beta titanium alloy makes a particularly good intermediate arch wire, the 0.017 by 0.025 and the 0.019 by 0.025 inch sizes having about twice the stiffness in the horizontal plane but equal rigidity in the vertical plane when compared with 0.016 and 0.018 inch stainless steel. In torsion not even the largest sizes of nickel-titanium (0.021 by 0.025 inch) or beta titanium (0.019 by 0.025 inch) wire meet the stiffness requirements of an 0.019 by 0.026 inch stainless steel wire, thereby making the established alloys the finishing wire of choice.
将镍钛合金和β钛合金弓丝的理论强度、刚度和范围与几种不锈钢或钴铬合金丝进行了比较。以表观刚度为标准,在传统弓丝合金和新型弓丝合金的弹性区域内建立了等效的力系统。在弯曲方面,此类计算表明,镍钛合金制成的起始弓丝性能优越,0.016英寸、0.018英寸以及0.018×0.018英寸的镍钛合金丝的刚度分别与多股0.0175英寸、圆形0.012英寸和0.014英寸不锈钢丝相似,但其强度和范围约为不锈钢丝的两倍。通过相同的分析方法,β钛合金制成的中间弓丝表现出色,与0.016英寸和0.018英寸不锈钢丝相比,0.017×0.025英寸和0.019×0.025英寸尺寸的β钛合金丝在水平面的刚度约为不锈钢丝的两倍,而在垂直面的刚度与之相当。在扭转方面,即使是最大尺寸的镍钛合金丝(0.021×0.025英寸)或β钛合金丝(0.019×0.025英寸)也无法满足0.019×0.026英寸不锈钢丝的刚度要求,因此现有合金仍是首选的终末弓丝。