Kusy R P, Greenberg A R
Am J Orthod. 1982 Sep;82(3):199-205. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90139-7.
The elastic strength, stiffness, and range of two titanium alloys are compared as a function of wire configuration. From the four beta titanium and eight nickel-titanium sizes available, all arch wire permutations were evaluated both in bending and in torsion. Results show that the stiffnesses of the two alloy compositions overlap substantially, except for those wires with the lowest and the highest stiffnesses--that is, the 0.016 and 0.018 inch nickel-titanium and the 0.017 by 0.025 and 0.019 by 0.025 inch beta titanium arch wires, respectively. To conclude, both "variable-cross-section" and "variable-modulus" orthodontics are illustrated within the context of an equivalent wire stiffness chart which includes conventional stainless steel arch wires.
比较了两种钛合金的弹性强度、刚度和范围与丝材构型的关系。从现有的四种β钛合金和八种镍钛合金尺寸中,对所有弓丝排列进行了弯曲和扭转评估。结果表明,两种合金成分的刚度基本重叠,但刚度最低和最高的丝材除外,即0.016英寸和0.018英寸的镍钛合金弓丝以及0.017×0.025英寸和0.019×0.025英寸的β钛合金弓丝。总之,在包含传统不锈钢弓丝的等效丝材刚度图表的背景下,展示了“可变横截面”和“可变模量”正畸技术。