Hasler M, Gmür J, von Felten A
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1978 Oct 14;108(41):1596-7.
Thrombocytopenic patients refractory to random-donor platelet support can usually be substituted by platelets obtained from donors identical with respect to HLA-A and -B antigens [1]. Since such "full-house" identity is rarely available, reliable cross-match tests (CM) are needed in order to pick out donors compatible in spite of HLA non-identity. By use of the thrombocyte migration test (TMT), DUQUESNOY et al. have shown that antiplatelet antibodies may exert an inhibitory effect on platelet migration. Therefore, we have explored this test system for its efficiency as CM compared with the "long-time" lymphocyte cytotoxicity test (LLT). Of 8 sera from polysensitized patients, serial dilutions were performed and simultaneously tested by TMT and LLT with cells obtained from the same control individuals. The sensitivity of TMT exceeded LLT by 2-4 dilution steps in all sera tested. Moreover, 9 patients with incompatible transfusion responses to single-donor platelets in spite of negative LLT had the following results in TMT with pre-transfusion sera: 5 positive (i.e. migration inhibition), 1 negative: enhanced migration was observed 3 times. This phenomenon of enhancement remains to be clarified, since low titers of anti-HLA-antibodies do not cause enhanced platelet migration. Repeated transfusion of platelets obtained from the same donor may cause antibody production against leukocytic antigen not shared by platelets, leading to "false-positive" LLT. 2 patients were successfully substituted with platelets from HLA/MLC-identical siblings in spite of positive LLT, but with negative TMT; in 2 cases with unrelated HLA-A and -B identical donors, TMT results were inconsistent.
对随机供者血小板支持治疗无效的血小板减少症患者,通常可用HLA - A和 - B抗原相同的供者提供的血小板替代治疗[1]。由于这种“完全匹配”的情况很少见,因此需要可靠的交叉配型试验(CM)来挑选出尽管HLA不完全相同但仍具有相容性的供者。通过血小板迁移试验(TMT),迪凯斯诺伊等人已经表明抗血小板抗体可能对血小板迁移产生抑制作用。因此,我们探讨了该试验系统作为交叉配型试验与“长时间”淋巴细胞毒性试验(LLT)相比的效率。对8例多致敏患者的血清进行系列稀释,并同时用TMT和LLT对来自相同对照个体的细胞进行检测。在所有检测的血清中,TMT的敏感性比LLT高出2 - 4个稀释度。此外,9例尽管LLT结果为阴性但对单供者血小板有不相容输血反应的患者,其输血前血清的TMT结果如下:5例阳性(即迁移抑制),1例阴性,有3次观察到迁移增强。这种增强现象仍有待阐明,因为低滴度的抗HLA抗体不会导致血小板迁移增强。反复输注来自同一供者的血小板可能会导致针对血小板不共有的白细胞抗原产生抗体,从而导致LLT出现“假阳性”。2例患者尽管LLT结果为阳性,但TMT结果为阴性,成功地用HLA/MLC相同的同胞供者的血小板替代治疗;在2例与无关供者HLA - A和 - B相同的病例中,TMT结果不一致。