Kimura E, Sakuma A
Jpn Heart J. 1980 Jan;21(1):47-57. doi: 10.1536/ihj.21.47.
The efficacy on congestive heart failure of metildigoxin (beta-methyldigoxin, MD), a derivative of digoxin (DX), which had a good absorption rate from digestive tract, was examined in a double blind study using a gorup comparison method. After achieving digitalization with oral MD or intravenous deslanoside in the non-blind manner, maintenance treatment was initiated and the effects of orally administered MD and DX were compared. MD was administered in 44 cases, DX in 42. The usefulness of the drug was evaluated after 2 weeks, taking into account the condition of the patient and the case of administration. No significant difference was observed between the usefulness of MD and that of DX. The use of digitalis differs according to the preparation involved. In the double blind study on MD and DX, the way in which digitalis was used may have inclined towards the way in which DX, which is more familiar to us, is used. Therefore, even if MD were superior to DX in usefulness, it would be difficult to obtain a result which proved this. Taking these points into consideration, it is concluded that MD is practically useful in clinical medicine.
在一项采用组间比较法的双盲研究中,对消化道吸收率良好的地高辛(DX)衍生物甲地高辛(β-甲基地高辛,MD)治疗充血性心力衰竭的疗效进行了研究。在以非盲法口服MD或静脉注射去乙酰毛花苷实现洋地黄化后,开始维持治疗,并比较口服MD和DX的效果。MD组44例,DX组42例。2周后,综合考虑患者病情和用药情况评估药物疗效。MD和DX的疗效未见显著差异。洋地黄的使用因制剂不同而有所差异。在关于MD和DX的双盲研究中,洋地黄的使用方式可能倾向于我们更熟悉的DX的使用方式。因此,即使MD在疗效上优于DX,也很难得到证实这一点的结果。考虑到这些因素,得出结论:MD在临床医学中实际有用。