Suppr超能文献

五种主要抗惊厥药物的发射分析。对两种不同动力学分析仪适应性的评估。

Emit assays for five major anticonvulsant drugs. An evaluation of adaptations to two discrete kinetic analyzers.

作者信息

Dietzler D N, Hoelting C R, Leckie M P, Smith C H, Tieber V L

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1980 Jul;74(1):41-50. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/74.1.41.

Abstract

Because of the complex reaction kinetics observed with the enzyme multiplied immunoassay technic (EMIT), each adaptation of these assays must be specifically evaluated. Evaluations were done of the totally automated adaptations of these immunoassays for diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital, primidone, carbamazepine, and ethosuximide to two kinetic analyzers that use markedly different reaction conditions, the Gilford System 3500 and the Abbott Bichromatic Analyzer-100. Comparisons of data from EMIT assays on the Gilford 3500 with data from EMIT assays on the ABA-100 and with data from gas-liquid chromatographic analyses for the five anticonvulsant drugs showed good correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.96) and little or no additive or proportional biases, as determined by joint confidence intervals. Between-run precision for each EMIT anticonvulsant drug assay on both analyzers was less than 6%, better than that obtained with gas chromatography. No interference by more than 40 different drugs, by hemoglobin (6 g/l), or by bilirubin (200 mg/l), and no or minimal cross-reactivity with any of the five EMIT anticonvulsant drug assays on either analyzer were found.

摘要

由于酶放大免疫分析技术(EMIT)呈现出复杂的反应动力学,这些分析方法的每种适配都必须进行专门评估。针对苯妥英、苯巴比妥、扑米酮、卡马西平和乙琥胺的这些免疫分析方法在两种反应条件显著不同的动力学分析仪(吉尔福德系统3500和雅培双波长分析仪-100)上的全自动化适配进行了评估。对吉尔福德3500上的EMIT分析数据与雅培双波长分析仪-100上的EMIT分析数据以及五种抗惊厥药物的气液色谱分析数据进行比较,结果显示相关性良好(r大于或等于0.96),并且根据联合置信区间确定,几乎没有或不存在相加或比例偏差。两种分析仪上每种EMIT抗惊厥药物分析的批间精密度均小于6%,优于气相色谱法。未发现超过40种不同药物、血红蛋白(6 g/l)或胆红素(200 mg/l)产生干扰,并且在任何一种分析仪上,五种EMIT抗惊厥药物分析之间均未发现或仅有极小的交叉反应性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验