Suppr超能文献

胍法辛与可乐定作为抗高血压药物的比较。

Comparison of guanfacine and clonidine as antihypertensive agents.

作者信息

Jäättelä A

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):67S-70S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb04908.x.

Abstract
  1. The antihypertensive effects and side-effects of guanfacine and clonidine were compared in a single-blind, cross-over study. 2. The study consisted of two active treatment periods of 6 weeks each, which were both preceded by a 2 weeks placebo period. Thirty ambulatory, hypertensive patients (blood pressure WHO severity grades I-II) were admitted to the study. The results are based on the 24 patients who completed the study. 3. The optimal daily dose of guanfacine was in over half of the patients 3-4 mg, and of clonidine correspondingly 0.3-0.45 mg. A similar and statistically significant decrease in blood pressure was achieved with both drugs. 4. The most common side-effects with both drugs were tiredness and dryness of the mouth.
摘要
  1. 在一项单盲交叉研究中比较了胍法辛和可乐定的降压效果及副作用。2. 该研究包括两个各为期6周的积极治疗期,每个治疗期之前均有一个为期2周的安慰剂期。30名非卧床高血压患者(世界卫生组织血压严重程度分级为I-II级)被纳入该研究。结果基于完成研究的24名患者。3. 超过半数患者的胍法辛最佳日剂量为3 - 4毫克,可乐定相应为0.3 - 0.45毫克。两种药物均使血压出现类似且具有统计学意义的下降。4. 两种药物最常见的副作用是疲倦和口干。

相似文献

1
Comparison of guanfacine and clonidine as antihypertensive agents.胍法辛与可乐定作为抗高血压药物的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):67S-70S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb04908.x.
6
7
Evaluation of guanfacine and clonidine in essential hypertension: a single-blind crossover study.
Med J Aust. 1980 Oct 4;2(7):395-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1980.tb131883.x.
10
Clonidine and guanfacine in hypertension.可乐定与胍法辛治疗高血压
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Mar;37(3):271-6. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1985.39.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验