Bergroth V, Reitamo S, Konttinen T, Lalla M
Histochemistry. 1980;68(1):17-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00498496.
Optimally fixed paraffin enbedded tissue sections and cytocentrifuged cell smears were used to test the sensitivity and nonspecific staining with the enzyme-bridge, PAP, indirect and direct immunoperoxidase methods using human immunoglobulins and lysozyme as antigens. With the enzyme-bridge method positive staining was seen with primary antiserum dilutions up to 1:20,000. The least background staining was observed with this method. The PAP method was equally sensitive, although false-negative results with low primary antiserum dilutions were seen. Some nonspecific background staining always persisted using the PAP method even with high primary antiserum dilutions. The indirect method was not as sensitive as the enzyme-bridge method and some nonspecific staining always persisted. The direct method was too insensitive with paraffin embedded tissue sections.
使用最佳固定的石蜡包埋组织切片和细胞离心涂片,以人免疫球蛋白和溶菌酶作为抗原,采用酶桥法、PAP法、间接免疫过氧化物酶法和直接免疫过氧化物酶法检测敏感性和非特异性染色。酶桥法在高达1:20,000的一抗稀释度下可见阳性染色。该方法观察到的背景染色最少。PAP法同样敏感,尽管在低一抗稀释度下出现了假阴性结果。即使在高一抗稀释度下,使用PAP法时仍始终存在一些非特异性背景染色。间接法不如酶桥法敏感,并且始终存在一些非特异性染色。直接法对石蜡包埋组织切片过于不敏感。