• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胶体渗透压降低会增加脓毒症患者的肺功能障碍吗?

Does reduced colloid oncotic pressure increase pulmonary dysfunction in sepsis?

作者信息

Kohler J P, Rice C L, Zarins C K, Cammack B F, Moss G S

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1981 Feb;9(2):90-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198102000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-198102000-00004
PMID:7006918
Abstract

Starling's hypothesis of forces governing fluid movement across capillary membranes suggests that any unopposed decrease in intracapillary colloid oncotic pressure (COP) or increase in capillary permeability should result in increased interstitial fluid. Iso-oncotic increase in pulmonary artery wedge (PAW) causes pulmonary dysfunction. Isobaric reduction of COP with normal capillary permeability does not result in pulmonary interstitial edema. Because sepsis is a frequent antecedent of clinical pulmonary dysfunction, the question was asked: does reduction in the COP-PAW gradient in the presence of sepsis result in increased pulmonary dysfunction? Twenty baboons were studied: group 1--control, group 2--4-h constant infusion of E. coli, group 3--plasmapheresis alone, group 4--plasmapheresis followed by sepsis. Ringer's lactate was infused to keep PAW constant. Arterial and mixed venous blood gases were drawn and the intrapulmonary shunt (QS/QT) was calculated. The data were compared using Tukey's HSD test and one way analysis of variance. Plasmapheresis alone resulted in a 68% reduction in COP (15 +/- 2.9 (SD) torr to 4.6 +/- 0.6 in group 3 and 16.5 +/- 4.3 to 5.7 +/- 0.9 in group 4, p less than 0.05). Sepsis resulted in an increase in QS/QT in all septic animals. There was no increased QS/QT in those animals that had sepsis added to plasmapheresis, group 4 (p less than 0.05). These data indicate that sepsis leads to pulmonary dysfunction but that this dysfunction appears to be independent of colloid oncotic forces.

摘要

斯塔林关于控制液体通过毛细血管膜运动的力的假说表明,毛细血管内胶体渗透压(COP)的任何无对抗性降低或毛细血管通透性增加都应导致间质液增加。肺动脉楔压(PAW)的等渗增加会导致肺功能障碍。在毛细血管通透性正常的情况下,等压降低COP不会导致肺间质水肿。由于脓毒症是临床肺功能障碍的常见前驱因素,因此提出了一个问题:在脓毒症存在的情况下,COP-PAW梯度降低是否会导致肺功能障碍增加?对20只狒狒进行了研究:第1组为对照组,第2组为持续4小时输注大肠杆菌,第3组为单纯血浆置换,第4组为血浆置换后发生脓毒症。输注乳酸林格液以维持PAW恒定。采集动脉血和混合静脉血气体,并计算肺内分流(QS/QT)。使用Tukey's HSD检验和单因素方差分析对数据进行比较。单纯血浆置换导致COP降低68%(第3组从15±2.9(标准差)托降至4.6±0.6,第4组从16.5±4.3降至5.7±0.9,p<0.05)。脓毒症导致所有脓毒症动物的QS/QT增加。在血浆置换后添加脓毒症的动物(第4组)中,QS/QT没有增加(p<0.05)。这些数据表明,脓毒症会导致肺功能障碍,但这种功能障碍似乎与胶体渗透压无关。

相似文献

1
Does reduced colloid oncotic pressure increase pulmonary dysfunction in sepsis?胶体渗透压降低会增加脓毒症患者的肺功能障碍吗?
Crit Care Med. 1981 Feb;9(2):90-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198102000-00004.
2
Pulmonary dysfunction in sepsis: is pulmonary edema the culprit?脓毒症中的肺功能障碍:肺水肿是罪魁祸首吗?
J Trauma. 1982 Apr;22(4):280-4.
3
Crystalloid vs. colloid resuscitation: is one better? A randomized clinical study.晶体液与胶体液复苏:哪种更好?一项随机临床研究。
Surgery. 1979 Feb;85(2):129-39.
4
Does reduced colloid oncotic pressure increase pulmonary dysfunction in sepsis?胶体渗透压降低会增加脓毒症患者的肺功能障碍吗?
Curr Surg. 1980 Mar-Apr;37(2):123-5.
5
Serum oncotic pressure and oncotic-hydrostatic pressure differences in critically ill patients.重症患者的血清胶体渗透压及胶体渗透压与流体静压之差
Anesth Analg. 1982 Jun;61(6):496-8.
6
Plasma colloid oncotic pressure-pulmonary artery occlusion pressure gradient. A poor predictor of pulmonary edema in surgical intensive care unit patients.血浆胶体渗透压-肺动脉闭塞压梯度。外科重症监护病房患者肺水肿的一个不良预测指标。
Arch Surg. 1983 Jul;118(7):841-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390070049010.
7
The effect of sepsis and reduced colloid osmotic pressure on pulmonary edema.脓毒症及胶体渗透压降低对肺水肿的影响。
J Surg Res. 1979 Nov;27(5):347-51. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(79)90151-3.
8
[Pulmonary extravascular water in patients with acute respiratory failure].[急性呼吸衰竭患者的肺血管外水分]
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2006 Nov-Dec(6):31-7.
9
[Clinical practice interpretation of oncotic pressure, serum albumin and protein determination and their ability for guiding therapeutics in cases of disturbances of capillary exchanges].[毛细血管交换紊乱病例中胶体渗透压、血清白蛋白和蛋白质测定的临床实践解读及其指导治疗的能力]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1996;15(4):456-63. doi: 10.1016/0750-7658(96)83206-0.
10
Mechanical ventilation with permissive hypercapnia increases intrapulmonary shunt in septic and nonseptic patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.采用允许性高碳酸血症的机械通气会增加脓毒症和非脓毒症急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的肺内分流。
Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb;30(2):285-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200202000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Debate: Albumin administration should be avoided in the critically ill.辩论:危重症患者应避免输注白蛋白。
Crit Care. 2000;4(3):151-5. doi: 10.1186/cc688.
2
Therapeutic interchange as a cost-containment measure {editorial}.作为一种成本控制措施的治疗性药物互换{社论}
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Nov;2(5):347-51. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202050-00001.