Suppr超能文献

吻合器胃切除术与手工缝合胃切除术的比较。

Comparison of stapled and hand-sutured gastrectomies.

作者信息

Weil P H, Scherz H

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1981 Jan;116(1):14-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380130008003.

Abstract

We reviewed 585 Billroth II gastrectomies to compare the results of stapled and hand-sutured cases. In 385 patients who had the duodenal stump handled by conventional methods, 18 (4.7%) leaked, compared with four (2.5%) leaks in 160 patients who had the duodenal stump stapled. In 474 hand-sutured anastomoses, there were 12 complications (leaks, hemorrhage, or obstruction), whereas there were no complications in 71 stapled anastomoses. We conclude that stapling provides an expedient way of performing gastrectomies that is at least as safe if not safer than conventional hand suture.

摘要

我们回顾了585例毕Ⅱ式胃切除术,以比较吻合器吻合与手工缝合病例的结果。在385例采用传统方法处理十二指肠残端的患者中,有18例(4.7%)发生渗漏,而在160例采用吻合器处理十二指肠残端的患者中,有4例(2.5%)发生渗漏。在474例手工缝合吻合术中,有12例出现并发症(渗漏、出血或梗阻),而在71例吻合器吻合术中未出现并发症。我们得出结论,吻合器吻合为胃切除术提供了一种便捷的方法,至少与传统手工缝合一样安全,甚至可能更安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验