• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用EMIT、Immophase和Dac-Cel放射免疫分析法对地高辛进行分析的比较。

Comparison of digoxin analysis by EMIT with Immophase and Dac-Cel radioimmunoassay.

作者信息

Rumley A G, Trope A, Rowe D J, Hainsworth I R

出版信息

Ann Clin Biochem. 1980 Nov;17(6):315-8. doi: 10.1177/000456328001700607.

DOI:10.1177/000456328001700607
PMID:7011165
Abstract

The results obtained by an enzyme multiplied immunoassay kit, EMIT, for the measurement of serum digoxin concentration were compared with those from two radioimmunoassay kit methods, Immophase and Dac-Cel. Patients' sera were used to study the correlation between the methods, and three quality control sera with low, intermediate, and high digoxin concentrations were used to study individual method precision. The coefficients of correlation between the three methods varied between 0.915 and 0.951 for serum drug concentrations up to 4.5 nmol/l. There were statistically significant differences between the means of the patients' samples for each method. Precision was acceptable for each method: within-batch percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) less than 8, between-batch %CV less than 10, except for Dac-Cel at low concentration %CV = 18.6. The time taken for the analysis of a batch of 10 samples was between 1.5 and 2 hours, depending on the method.

摘要

采用酶放大免疫分析试剂盒(EMIT)测定血清地高辛浓度,并与两种放射免疫分析试剂盒方法(Immophase和Dac-Cel)的测定结果进行比较。使用患者血清研究各方法之间的相关性,并使用三种低、中、高地高辛浓度的质量控制血清研究各方法的精密度。对于血清药物浓度高达4.5 nmol/l的情况,三种方法之间的相关系数在0.915至0.951之间。各方法患者样本均值之间存在统计学显著差异。各方法的精密度均可接受:批内变异系数百分比(%CV)小于8,批间%CV小于10,但低浓度时Dac-Cel的%CV = 18.6除外。根据方法不同,分析一批10个样本所需时间在1.5至2小时之间。

相似文献

1
Comparison of digoxin analysis by EMIT with Immophase and Dac-Cel radioimmunoassay.采用EMIT、Immophase和Dac-Cel放射免疫分析法对地高辛进行分析的比较。
Ann Clin Biochem. 1980 Nov;17(6):315-8. doi: 10.1177/000456328001700607.
2
Factors of importance for valid digitalis assays particularly for the determination of digoxin in plasma and urine.
Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1986;59 Suppl 4:1-62.
3
Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay of serum digoxin with use of a bichromatic analyzer.使用双色分析仪进行血清地高辛的均相酶免疫测定。
Clin Chem. 1979 Jan;25(1):169-71.
4
[Determination of digoxin in serum. Comparison of radioimmunoassay and a heterogeneous enzyme immunoassay (author's transl)].血清中地高辛的测定。放射免疫分析法与非均相酶免疫分析法的比较(作者译)
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1978 Jun;16(6):335-42.
5
A comparison of automated and manual radioimmunoassays for the estimation of serum digoxin.用于估算血清地高辛的自动化放射免疫分析与手工放射免疫分析的比较。
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1984 Jan;22(1):119-21.
6
Precision of digoxin radioimmunoassays and matrix effects: four kits compared.地高辛放射免疫分析的精密度和基质效应:四种试剂盒的比较
Clin Biochem. 1981 Apr;14(2):67-71. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(81)90704-9.
7
Intercomparison of seven radioimmunoassay kits and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay kit for digoxin.
Clin Chem. 1984 Jul;30(7):1225-7.
8
Comparison of a fluorescent immunoassay with an enzyme immunoassay and a radioimmunoassay for gentamicin.荧光免疫测定法与酶免疫测定法及放射免疫测定法检测庆大霉素的比较。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984 Dec;41(12):2647-50.
9
Evaluation of the fluorescence polarization immunoassay for quantitation of digoxin in serum.用于血清中地高辛定量的荧光偏振免疫测定法的评估。
Ther Drug Monit. 1984;6(4):454-7. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198412000-00013.
10
Falsely increased results for digoxin in sera from patients with liver disease: ten immunoassay kits compared.肝病患者血清中地高辛结果假性升高:十种免疫分析试剂盒的比较
Clin Chem. 1985 Jun;31(6):1078-9.