Rossing T H, Fanta C H, McFadden E R
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Feb;123(2):190-4. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.2.190.
Eighty-nine patients who presented to the hospital for treatment of acute episodes of asthma were randomly assigned to initial therapy with subcutaneously administered epinephrine or 1 of 2 combination regimens consisting of intravenously administered aminophylline and either subcutaneously administered of epinephrine or inhaled isoproterenol. During the first hour of treatment, as a group, the patients treated with the 2-drug regimens showed greater objective improvement than did patients who received epinephrine alone. This was particularly true for patients with either severe airway obstruction or a subtherapeutic theophylline concentration at the time of presentation. There were no differences in the heart rate and blood pressure responses to the 3 regimens, and symptoms consistent with drug side effects were not reported more frequently by patients treated with 2 drugs. Thus, the combination of sympathomimetics and aminophylline appear more effective, and no more toxic, than epinephrine alone for the initial treatment of acute episodes of asthma.
89名因哮喘急性发作到医院就诊的患者被随机分配接受初始治疗,治疗方案为皮下注射肾上腺素,或两种联合治疗方案之一,即静脉注射氨茶碱并皮下注射肾上腺素或吸入异丙肾上腺素。在治疗的第一个小时内,总体而言,接受两种药物治疗方案的患者比单独接受肾上腺素治疗的患者表现出更大的客观改善。对于就诊时患有严重气道阻塞或茶碱浓度未达治疗水平的患者尤其如此。三种治疗方案在心率和血压反应方面没有差异,接受两种药物治疗的患者报告的与药物副作用相符的症状也没有更频繁。因此,对于哮喘急性发作的初始治疗,拟交感神经药与氨茶碱联合使用似乎比单独使用肾上腺素更有效,且毒性并不更高。