Haies D M, Gil J, Weibel E R
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 May;123(5):533-41. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.5.533.
Four normal rat lungs were positive-pressure inflated (7 mm Hg downslope) and perfusion-fixed for electron microscopy. Morphometric analysis yielded estimates for compartmental volume densities in alveolar septal lung tissue excluding capillaries: type I cells, 0.126; type II cells, 0.097; endothelium, 0.264; interstitial cells, 0.358; interstitial space, 0.116; macrophages, 0.039. Numerically, the largest cell population of the parenchymal tissue was the endothelial cells (43%) followed by interstitial (31.8%), type II (14.5%), and type I (7.5%) epithelial cells; 3.2% were macrophages. Individual type I cells possessed the largest cell volume (915 micron3) as well as th largest luminal surface (4,518 micron3), covering 97.5% of the alveolar surface. Type II cells (volume, 366 micron3; surface, 62 micron2) line only 2.5% of the alveolus. Total endothelial surface is 16% larger than the alveolar surface, although individual endothelial cells are much smaller (volume, 336 micron3; luminal surface, 946 micron 2) than type I cells. Macrophages and interstitial cells (cell volume, 665 and 615 micron3, respectively) are of an intermediate size. By restricting the reference frame to alveolar septal tissue, surface and volume estimates agree well in most cases with instillation-fixed lungs. Caution is nevertheless indicated in interpreting such comparisons because differing fixation/inflation techniques generate unequal osmotic and oncotic pressure gradients.
对四只正常大鼠的肺进行正压充气(7毫米汞柱下坡压)并灌注固定以进行电子显微镜检查。形态计量学分析得出了肺泡间隔肺组织(不包括毛细血管)中各部分体积密度的估计值:I型细胞为0.126;II型细胞为0.097;内皮细胞为0.264;间质细胞为0.358;间质间隙为0.116;巨噬细胞为0.039。从数量上看,实质组织中最大的细胞群体是内皮细胞(43%),其次是间质细胞(31.8%)、II型上皮细胞(14.5%)和I型上皮细胞(7.5%);3.2%是巨噬细胞。单个I型细胞具有最大的细胞体积(915立方微米)以及最大的管腔表面积(4518立方微米),覆盖了97.5%的肺泡表面。II型细胞(体积为366立方微米;表面积为62平方微米)仅覆盖2.5%的肺泡。尽管单个内皮细胞比I型细胞小得多(体积为336立方微米;管腔表面积为946平方微米),但内皮细胞的总表面积比肺泡表面大16%。巨噬细胞和间质细胞(细胞体积分别为665和615立方微米)大小居中。通过将参考框架限制在肺泡间隔组织,在大多数情况下,表面和体积估计值与滴注固定的肺组织吻合良好。然而,在解释此类比较时仍需谨慎,因为不同的固定/充气技术会产生不等的渗透压和胶体渗透压梯度。